Shocking Soybean Showdown: Trump vs Harris Policies Ignite Trade War Fears in US Agriculture

KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI, US — As the presidential election looms, American farmers find themselves at the center of a heated debate over Trump vs Harris agricultural policies. The stark contrast between the candidates’ approaches to international trade and domestic agricultural support has ignited concerns about potential US agriculture trade wars and their impact on the rural economy.

The Stakes: US Agriculture in the Crosshairs

Recent surveys and industry analyses have cast a spotlight on the complex interplay between presidential politics and the agricultural sector. Both Donald Trump and Kamala Harris bring unique perspectives shaped by their past experiences with policies that have directly affected American farmers. However, a September poll of agricultural economists revealed a concerning trend: neither candidate’s proposed policies were viewed as broadly beneficial for US agriculture from an economic standpoint.

Even more troubling, the survey indicated that Republican Donald Trump’s policies were perceived as potentially more harmful to the agricultural sector compared to those of Democrat Kamala Harris. This assessment has sent shockwaves through farming communities, raising questions about the presidential election’s impact on US agriculture.

The Specter of Trade Wars: A Looming Threat

At the heart of farmers’ concerns lies the potential for renewed trade conflicts, particularly with China – the world’s leading importer of many agricultural commodities, including US soybeans. The memory of the 2018 trade war initiated by then-President Trump remains fresh in the minds of many in the agricultural sector.

• In 2018, Trump imposed tariffs on over $30 billion worth of Chinese products
• China retaliated with tariffs specifically targeting US agricultural products
• The US-China agricultural trade war impact was severe, particularly for soybean farmers

The consequences of this trade dispute were far-reaching:

• Total US soybean exports plummeted 18% from 2.13 billion bushels in 2017-18 to 1.75 billion bushels in 2018-19
• US soybean exports to China specifically dropped by a staggering 70%
• Soybean prices tumbled by $2 per bushel
• The total loss to US agriculture during this period exceeded $27 billion, with soybeans accounting for 71% of those annualized losses

As farmers grapple with these memories, the Trump vs Harris soybean policies have become a focal point of the current election cycle.

The Brazil Factor: A New Agricultural Powerhouse

The trade war had an unexpected consequence: it catapulted Brazil into the position of a major agricultural competitor. As China soybean imports shifted away from the US, Brazil stepped in to fill the void:

• In 2017-18, Brazilian soybean production reached 120.30 million tonnes, with exports at 76.20 million tonnes
• US soybean production for the same period was 120.04 million tonnes, with exports at 57.95 million tonnes
• By 2023-24, Brazilian soybean production is projected to reach 153 million tonnes – 26% higher than US production
• Brazil’s 2023-24 exports are estimated at 104.17 million tonnes, a staggering 56% higher than US exports

This shift in the global soybean market has intensified the soybean export competition USA vs Brazil, with far-reaching implications for American farmers.

Candidates’ Stances: A Tale of Two Approaches

As the election approaches, both candidates have outlined their positions on trade and agriculture:

Donald Trump’s Approach:

• Pledged to impose an additional 60% tariff on Chinese imports
• Proposed a 10% to 20% tariff on other imported goods
• Suggested a 200% tariff on John Deere equipment manufactured in Mexico

Kamala Harris’s Strategy:

• A more diplomatic approach to managing economic and security threats
• Focus on addressing China’s alleged unfair trading practices
• Emphasis on protecting US technology and manufacturing interests

These contrasting approaches have left farmers wondering about the potential tariff effects on US soybean market and broader agricultural trade.

Industry Concerns: American Soybean Association Speaks Out

The American Soybean Association (ASA) has been vocal about the potential consequences of renewed trade conflicts. A recent study commissioned by the ASA and the National Corn Growers Association painted a grim picture of a potential new trade war:

• Slashed US agricultural commodity exports
• Plummeting prices for corn and soybeans in the United States
• Degradation of rural communities and economies
• Financial benefits shifting to South American markets

Josh Gackle, president of the ASA, testified before the US House of Representatives earlier this year, emphasizing the critical importance of maintaining trade relations with China. He highlighted that nearly one in three rows of soybeans grown in the United States is destined for China, underscoring the significance of US-China trade relations for the agricultural sector.

The Rural Economy at Stake

The potential rural economy impact of trade policies and agricultural decisions cannot be overstated. With China remaining the top buyer for US soybean supplies, any disruption to this trade relationship could have severe consequences:

• 2023 US soybean exports to China were valued at $15.06 billion
• The next largest destination (European Union) was valued 77% lower at $3.45 billion

These figures underscore the delicate balance of rural economy and soybean trade policies, highlighting the need for careful consideration of any trade-related decisions.

Looking Ahead: The Future of US Agriculture

As voters prepare to cast their ballots, the agricultural community remains divided on which candidate may best support US agricultural interests at home and abroad. The complex interplay of Trump vs Harris agricultural policies, international trade dynamics, and domestic economic concerns has created a challenging landscape for American farmers to navigate.

Regardless of the election outcome, it is clear that the next administration will face significant challenges in balancing the needs of the agricultural sector with broader economic and foreign policy goals. The presidential election impact on US agriculture will likely be felt for years to come, shaping the future of rural communities and the nation’s position in global agricultural markets.

As this shocking soybean showdown unfolds, farmers, policymakers, and consumers alike will be watching closely to see how the next chapter in US agricultural policy takes shape. The stakes are high, and the consequences of these decisions will resonate far beyond America’s heartland.

Stay informed about the latest agricultural developments with Farmonaut:

Access real-time satellite and weather data through our API. For detailed information, check out our API Developer Docs.

Download our mobile apps for on-the-go agricultural insights: