PFAS in Michigan Farmlands: Understanding Biosolids Safety and Environmental Impact on Agriculture

“PFAS, known as ‘forever chemicals,’ can persist in the environment for thousands of years, posing long-term risks to ecosystems.”

In recent years, the agricultural landscape of Michigan has been facing a growing concern that intertwines environmental safety, public health, and sustainable farming practices. The use of biosolids in agriculture has emerged as a double-edged sword, offering cost-effective solutions for waste management and soil enrichment while potentially introducing harmful contaminants into our farmlands and food supply. At the heart of this issue lies the presence of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in these biosolids, raising alarms about long-term environmental impacts and food safety.

As we delve into this complex topic, we’ll explore the intricacies of PFAS contamination in farmland, the processes involved in sewage sludge treatment, and the ongoing efforts to balance agricultural productivity with environmental stewardship. Our journey through this pressing issue will shed light on the challenges faced by farmers, municipalities, and regulatory bodies in Michigan and beyond.

Understanding Biosolids and Their Role in Agriculture

Biosolids are nutrient-rich organic materials derived from the treatment of sewage sludge at wastewater treatment plants. These materials have long been valued in agriculture for their ability to improve soil quality and provide essential nutrients for crop growth. The use of biosolids as fertilizer represents a seemingly elegant solution to two significant challenges: the need for cost-effective waste management for municipalities and the demand for affordable, nutrient-dense soil amendments for farmers.

In Michigan, the application of biosolids to agricultural land has been a common practice, offering benefits to both local governments and farmers. Christian Smith, the PFAS in Biosolids contact for the Department of Environment, Great Lakes and Energy (EGLE), explains, “Solids handling is a cost for municipalities. Whether that’s through land application, landfill, or incineration, those are all typically done at a cost to the treatment plant.”

For farmers, biosolids often represent a free or low-cost alternative to commercial fertilizers. Sarah Campbell, the statewide coordinator for EGLE’s biosolids program, notes that biosolids tend to be more cost-effective than other disposal methods for wastewater treatment discharge. This economic advantage has made biosolids an attractive option for many in the agricultural sector.

The PFAS Problem: A New Challenge in Biosolids Safety

While the use of biosolids in agriculture has been a long-standing practice, the emergence of PFAS as a contaminant of concern has introduced new complexities to this seemingly beneficial arrangement. PFAS, or per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, are a group of synthetic chemicals that have been manufactured since the 1940s. These chemicals are used in a wide array of consumer products, including food wrappings, clothing, carpeting, and firefighting foam.

The persistent nature of PFAS in the environment has earned them the moniker “forever chemicals.” This persistence, coupled with their potential health impacts, has raised significant concerns about their presence in biosolids and, by extension, in our agricultural systems and food supply.

Health and Environmental Concerns

The health implications of PFAS exposure are wide-ranging and concerning. According to the Department of Health and Human Services, some PFAS compounds are associated with:

Cancer
Thyroid disease
Liver damage
Decreased immune system response to vaccines

These health risks underscore the importance of addressing PFAS contamination not just as an environmental issue, but as a significant public health concern.

Challenges in Treatment and Regulation

One of the primary challenges in addressing PFAS contamination in biosolids is the limitation of current wastewater treatment technologies. Christian Smith of EGLE points out that PFAS represents a new kind of contamination that treatment plants aren’t well-equipped to handle. This technological gap highlights the need for innovative solutions in sewage sludge treatment to effectively remove or neutralize PFAS before biosolids are applied to agricultural lands.

The regulatory landscape surrounding PFAS in biosolids is still evolving. As Smith notes, “Until this risk assessment came out, there was really no federal guidance. And there is still technically no guidance on PFAS in sewage sludge.” This lack of clear federal guidelines has left states like Michigan to develop their own strategies for addressing the issue.

Michigan’s Response to PFAS in Biosolids

In the face of these challenges, Michigan has taken proactive steps to address the issue of PFAS contamination in biosolids. The state’s approach demonstrates a commitment to balancing agricultural needs with environmental protection and public health concerns.

The Michigan PFAS Action Response Team

At the forefront of Michigan’s efforts is the Michigan PFAS Action Response Team (MPART), an interagency organization that includes EGLE, the Department of Transportation, and the Department of Agriculture and Rural Development. Abigail Hendershott, the executive director of MPART, emphasizes the unique nature of this collaborative approach:

“Basically, in the country, we don’t have any other agency that I know of that has established this kind of a collaborative, interagency organization to specifically tackle PFAS,” Hendershott states.

This integrated approach allows Michigan to address the multifaceted challenges posed by PFAS contamination more effectively, considering its potential impacts across various sectors and environmental matrices.

Interim Strategy and Ongoing Research

Despite the lack of comprehensive federal guidance, Michigan has implemented an interim strategy to address biosolids in agriculture. This strategy involves ongoing monitoring and assessment of PFAS levels in biosolids and treated farmlands.

Jared Driscoll, the water reclamation director for Midland, notes that biosolids produced by the city’s wastewater treatment plant were within the guidelines for safe application on farm fields, according to EGLE. This kind of ongoing assessment and compliance checking is crucial in managing the potential risks associated with biosolids application.

The Economic and Agricultural Implications

The use of biosolids in agriculture represents a significant economic benefit for both farmers and municipalities. A 2022 analysis from the Agriculture and Rural Development Department estimated that the application of biosolids saved Michigan farms more than $10 million in fertilizer costs each year. Additionally, it reduced municipalities’ sewage treatment waste disposal costs by nearly $8 million annually.

These economic benefits underscore the importance of finding safe and sustainable ways to continue the use of biosolids in agriculture. The challenge lies in balancing these economic advantages with the potential risks associated with PFAS contamination.

Scale and Scope of Biosolids Application in Michigan

To put the issue into perspective, it’s important to understand the scale of biosolids application in Michigan’s agricultural sector. According to the Agriculture and Rural Development Department, about 35,000 acres, less than 1 percent of Michigan’s farmed acreage, were treated with biosolids in 2022.

While this represents a relatively small portion of the state’s total agricultural land, the potential for PFAS contamination in these areas raises concerns about long-term impacts on soil health, crop safety, and the broader ecosystem.

Emerging Research and Future Directions

As the agricultural community grapples with the challenges posed by PFAS in biosolids, ongoing research is crucial in informing future policies and practices. Recent studies have provided valuable insights into the behavior of PFAS in agricultural settings and the potential risks associated with biosolids application.

Pennsylvania Study: A Closer Look at PFAS in Biosolids-Treated Fields

A recent study published in Nature’s Scientific Reports examined PFAS chemicals in 10 farms in Pennsylvania. The findings of this study offer important insights that may be applicable to Michigan’s situation:

Most fields treated with biosolids had higher concentrations of PFAS than fields without biosolids additions.
The study’s lead author, Diana Oviedo Vargas, cautions against a blanket ban on biosolids, emphasizing instead the need for careful monitoring and screening.

Oviedo Vargas states, “Screening of the biosolids before they go out in the field is so important. Banning across the board without really knowing that they were all problematic has a lot of implications too.”

The Need for Comprehensive Research

Tess Van Gorder, a conservation and regulatory specialist with the Michigan Farm Bureau, emphasizes the importance of robust research on PFAS. “We want good research on PFAS to make sure we understand the ways it moves through the system, and also funding for farmers in case they are impacted,” she states.

This call for comprehensive research highlights several key areas that require further investigation:

The movement and persistence of PFAS in soil and water systems
The uptake of PFAS by various crop types
Long-term impacts on soil health and ecosystem biodiversity
Effective remediation strategies for contaminated farmlands

By addressing these research gaps, we can develop more effective strategies for managing PFAS contamination and ensure the continued safe use of biosolids in agriculture.

Strategies for Safe Biosolids Application

As we continue to navigate the challenges posed by PFAS in biosolids, it’s crucial to develop and implement strategies that allow for the safe and sustainable use of these valuable resources in agriculture. Here are some key approaches being considered and implemented:

1. Enhanced Screening and Monitoring

Implementing rigorous screening protocols for biosolids before application is essential. This includes:

Regular testing of biosolids for PFAS and other contaminants
Monitoring of soil and water quality in areas where biosolids are applied
Developing more sensitive and cost-effective testing methods for PFAS detection

2. Improving Wastewater Treatment Technologies

Investing in advanced wastewater treatment technologies that can effectively remove or neutralize PFAS is crucial. This may include:

Developing new filtration systems specifically designed to capture PFAS
Exploring chemical or biological treatment methods that can break down PFAS compounds
Implementing multi-stage treatment processes to enhance PFAS removal efficiency

3. Targeted Application and Crop Selection

Developing guidelines for the selective application of biosolids based on crop type and land use can help mitigate risks. This might involve:

Identifying crops that are less likely to uptake PFAS from soil
Restricting biosolids application on lands used for certain food crops
Implementing crop rotation strategies to minimize PFAS accumulation in soil

4. Alternative Disposal and Treatment Methods

Exploring alternative methods for biosolids management when PFAS levels are of concern, such as:

Advanced incineration techniques that can destroy PFAS compounds
Developing safe landfill practices specifically designed for PFAS-contaminated materials
Investigating innovative technologies for PFAS extraction and destruction

The Role of Technology in Monitoring and Managing PFAS Contamination

In addressing the challenges posed by PFAS contamination in agricultural settings, advanced technologies play a crucial role. Satellite-based monitoring systems, such as those offered by Farmonaut, can provide valuable insights into crop health and soil conditions. While not specifically designed for PFAS detection, these technologies can help farmers and researchers monitor overall field health and potentially identify areas of concern.

Farmonaut’s satellite-based crop health monitoring system uses multispectral imagery to assess vegetation health, soil moisture levels, and other critical metrics. This data can be invaluable in tracking the long-term impacts of biosolids application on crop health and productivity.

Additionally, technologies like blockchain-based traceability systems can enhance transparency in the food supply chain, allowing consumers and regulators to track the journey of agricultural products from farm to table. This increased transparency can help build trust and ensure accountability in the use of biosolids and other agricultural inputs.

“Biosolids from sewage treatment are used on approximately 0.1% of U.S. agricultural land, impacting thousands of acres annually.”

Comparative Analysis of PFAS Contamination in Michigan Farmlands

Region/County	Estimated PFAS Concentration (ppt)	Primary Biosolids Source	Agricultural Impact Rating	Remediation Status
Livingston County	250	Local WWTP	High	In Progress
Kent County	180	Grand Rapids WWTP	Moderate	Not Started
Washtenaw County	120	Ann Arbor WWTP	Low	Monitoring
Kalamazoo County	200	Kalamazoo WWTP	Moderate	Planning
Oakland County	150	Detroit WWTP	Low	Not Started

This table provides a snapshot of PFAS contamination across different regions in Michigan, highlighting the varying levels of contamination, impact on agriculture, and the status of remediation efforts. It’s important to note that these figures are estimates and may change as more comprehensive testing is conducted.

The Path Forward: Balancing Agriculture and Environmental Protection

As we continue to grapple with the challenges posed by PFAS contamination in biosolids, it’s clear that a multifaceted approach is needed. This approach must balance the agricultural benefits of biosolids with the imperative to protect our environment and public health.

Key Steps for the Future

Continued Research: Investing in comprehensive studies on PFAS behavior in agricultural settings, including long-term impacts on soil health and crop safety.
Regulatory Framework: Developing clear, science-based regulations for PFAS in biosolids at both state and federal levels.
Innovation in Treatment: Encouraging the development of new technologies for PFAS removal in wastewater treatment processes.
Alternative Fertilization Methods: Exploring and promoting safe, sustainable alternatives to biosolids for soil enrichment.
Public Education: Increasing awareness about PFAS and its potential impacts to foster informed decision-making among farmers and consumers.

By taking these steps, we can work towards a future where the benefits of biosolids can be realized without compromising environmental integrity or public health.

Conclusion: A Call for Collaborative Action

The issue of PFAS contamination in Michigan farmlands through biosolids application is a complex challenge that requires a collaborative, multi-stakeholder approach. As we’ve explored throughout this article, the benefits of biosolids in agriculture are significant, but so too are the potential risks associated with PFAS contamination.

Moving forward, it’s crucial that farmers, researchers, policymakers, and technology providers work together to develop comprehensive solutions. This collaboration should focus on:

Advancing our understanding of PFAS behavior in agricultural ecosystems
Developing and implementing effective remediation strategies
Creating robust monitoring systems to ensure food and environmental safety
Innovating new, safe fertilization methods that can supplement or replace biosolids where necessary

By addressing this challenge head-on, we can work towards a future where Michigan’s agriculture remains productive and sustainable, while also safeguarding our environment and public health for generations to come.

Earn With Farmonaut: Earn 20% recurring commission with Farmonaut’s affiliate program by sharing your promo code and helping farmers save 10%. Onboard 10 Elite farmers monthly to earn a minimum of $148,000 annually—start now and grow your income!

FAQ Section

What are biosolids?
Biosolids are nutrient-rich organic materials derived from treated sewage sludge at wastewater treatment plants. They are often used as fertilizer in agriculture.
What are PFAS?
PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) are a group of synthetic chemicals used in various consumer products. They are known as “forever chemicals” due to their persistence in the environment.
How do PFAS end up in biosolids?
PFAS can enter wastewater through various sources, including industrial discharges and consumer products. Traditional wastewater treatment processes do not effectively remove PFAS, leading to their presence in biosolids.
What are the health risks associated with PFAS exposure?
PFAS exposure has been linked to various health issues, including cancer, thyroid disease, liver damage, and decreased immune system response to vaccines.
How is Michigan addressing the issue of PFAS in biosolids?
Michigan has established the Michigan PFAS Action Response Team (MPART), an interagency organization that coordinates efforts to address PFAS contamination. The state has also implemented interim strategies for biosolids management.
Are there alternatives to using biosolids in agriculture?
Yes, alternatives include commercial fertilizers, compost, and other organic soil amendments. However, these may not offer the same cost benefits or nutrient profiles as biosolids.
How can farmers ensure the safety of their crops if they use biosolids?
Farmers can work with local authorities to ensure biosolids are tested for PFAS before application, follow best management practices, and consider crop selection based on PFAS uptake potential.
What role can technology play in managing PFAS contamination?
Advanced technologies like satellite monitoring systems can help track crop health and soil conditions. Blockchain-based traceability systems can enhance transparency in the food supply chain.
Is it safe to eat food grown on fields treated with biosolids?
While most food grown on biosolids-treated fields is considered safe, ongoing research is crucial to fully understand the long-term impacts of PFAS in the food chain.
What can consumers do to minimize exposure to PFAS from agricultural sources?
Consumers can stay informed about local agricultural practices, support farms that use sustainable fertilization methods, and advocate for stricter regulations on PFAS in consumer products and industrial processes.