Comment

Customer case study ยท Blueberries

Blueberry Root Rot After Harvest: An Oregon Case Study

Blueberry root rot risk rose on a 37-acre Willamette Valley field as each harvest wound down: satellite advisories scored Phytophthora root rot at 66% to 82% in September and October 2026, while the canopy’s NDVI stayed below its expected range and the soil read wet.

Authored by Farmonaut Research & Content Team
Reviewed and verified by Farmonaut Agricultural Experts Team
Updated 23 October 2026 ยท 12 min read
Blueberry Root Rot After Harvest: An Oregon Case Study, With Irrigation And Phytophthora Risk Advisory Cards
Illustration

Key takeaways

  • A Willamette Valley grower received 155 satellite advisories for a 37-acre (15 ha) highbush blueberry field from June 2025 to October 2026.
  • Phytophthora root rot was flagged in 39 advisories from mid-July to mid-December 2025, then returned on 1 September 2026 at 82% after no flags during peak picking.
  • In mid-October 2026 the canopy read an NDVI of 0.54 to 0.59, below the 0.65 to 0.80 expected after harvest, while radar soil moisture read high.
  • The advisories planned no water on 46.9% of days, 43% to 45% less than a same-dose daily routine, and cut back as Oregon’s autumn rain returned.
  • Potassium and phosphorus were flagged ahead of nitrogen, and 97.5% of nutrient lines named an organic option.
In this article
  1. The farm and the brief
  2. Why Oregon blueberries are worth protecting
  3. How satellite monitoring works on this field
  4. A season of advisories, from harvest to dormancy
  5. Blueberry root rot risk after harvest
  6. Risk by stage: what the advisories flagged and when
  7. Water: planned dry days in a wet autumn
  8. Nutrition and soil
  9. What other blueberry growers can take from it
  10. FAQ

Blueberry root rot risk rose on this Oregon field as each harvest wound down. Satellite advisories for a 37-acre (15 ha) highbush blueberry field in the Willamette Valley flagged Phytophthora root rot in 39 advisories between mid-July and mid-December 2025, then again from 1 September 2026, with modelled scores of 66% to 82%. At the same time the canopy read an NDVI of 0.54 to 0.59 in mid-October, below the 0.65 to 0.80 the advisories expect after harvest.

This case study walks through 155 advisories sent to the grower from June 2025 to October 2026. It shows what the satellite saw, what each advisory recommended, and how other berry growers can use the same signals. All figures come from the grower’s advisory records. Risk scores are modelled probabilities, not confirmed infections, and water figures are planned amounts, not metered use.

The farm and the brief

The grower farms one block of highbush blueberries in the Willamette Valley of western Oregon. The field covers about 37 acres (15 ha) and was planted in autumn 2022, so the bushes were in their third and fourth growing seasons during this record. The first advisory arrived in June 2025, and a new one has followed about every three days since then.

Where the blueberry field is

Oregon shaded; the marker shows the approximate area only

Where the blueberry field isOREGONCase-study fieldWillamette Valley (approx.)

Map: Farmonaut. Boundaries: Natural Earth (public domain). Location shown at region level to keep the grower anonymous.

A young planting on valley soil brings a clear set of jobs. Harvest runs through the summer, then the bushes put on new roots and set next year’s flower buds while autumn rain returns. That is also when wet soil and root disease become a concern. The grower wanted to see canopy vigour, water needs and pest and disease risk for the whole field without walking every row first.

Item Detail
Region Willamette Valley, Oregon, US
Crop Highbush blueberry
Field 1 field, about 37 acres (15 ha)
Planted Autumn 2022
Irrigation Drip
Monitoring period June 2025 to October 2026
Advisories 155 in total, about one every 3 days
Soil (modelled) pH mostly 4.8 to 5.5, low salinity, organic carbon rated low
Sentinel-2 Satellite View Of Farmland In The North Willamette Valley, Oregon
Sentinel-2 view of farmland in the north willamette valley, oregon. Contains modified copernicus sentinel data, processed in google earth engine. This shows the region, not the grower’s own field.

Why Oregon blueberries are worth protecting

Oregon is one of the largest blueberry states in the US. The USDA’s Noncitrus Fruits and Nuts 2025 Summary puts Oregon’s cultivated blueberry crop at 174 million pounds in 2025, from 13,900 harvested acres. That is an average of 12,500 lb per acre, against 7,340 lb per acre for the US as a whole. Growers received an average of $1.17 per pound, and the crop was worth $203.3 million.

Chart

Oregon cultivated blueberry production

Million pounds, total production, 2022โ€“2025

0.0M lb50.0M lb100.0M lb150.0M lb200.0M lb168.0M lb2022129.5M lb2023165.5M lb2024174.0M lb2025Source: USDA NASS, Noncitrus Fruits and Nuts 2024 Summary (May 2025) and 2025 Summary (May 2026).
0.0M lb50.0M lb100.0M lb150.0M lb200.0M lb168.0M lb2022129.5M lb2023165.5M lb2024174.0M lb2025Source: USDA NASS, Noncitrus Fruits and Nuts 2024 Summary (May2025) and 2025 Summary (May 2026).
Oregon’s crop fell by almost a quarter in 2023, then recovered to a new high in 2025.

The same NASS series shows how much a season can swing. Oregon’s crop fell from 168 million pounds in 2022 to 129.5 million in 2023, according to the 2024 summary, before it recovered. Supply swings like these feed the wider story of blueberry shortages and prices. On a single farm, a root problem that weakens next year’s flower buds is one of the quieter ways to lose part of a crop.

How satellite monitoring works on this field

Each advisory starts with fresh satellite images of the field. The Sentinel-2 satellites have a revisit time of five days with two satellites and give 10-metre detail in the visible and near-infrared bands. From these bands the system works out vegetation indices such as NDVI, which compares red and near-infrared light to show how much green leaf is present. A healthy, full canopy reads high. A thin or stressed canopy reads lower.

Infographic

How each blueberry advisory is built in 4 steps

  1. 1Satellite passSentinel-2 images the field every few days; radar adds soil moisture.
  2. 2Read the canopyNDVI shows whether the bushes are as green as the stage expects.
  3. 3Add weather and stageRain outlook, growth stage and local pest lists set water need and risk.
  4. 4Field planDrip plan, risk scores, nutrients with organic options, soil and yield.

The images are combined with radar-based soil moisture readings, the weather outlook, the bushes’ growth stage and the crop’s known water and nutrient needs. The result is one advisory with five parts: an irrigation plan for the coming days, pest and disease risk scores, weed risk, a fertilizer plan with organic options, and a soil and yield summary.

A satellite cannot see roots or a soil fungus. What it can see is a canopy that stays thin when it should be filling out, and soil that stays wet for long spells. When those two signals line up in the weeks after harvest, the advisory raises the root rot score so the grower knows where to dig and check first.

Farmonaut Blueberry Irrigation Plan And Satellite Crop-Health Map For A Willamette Valley Field (Illustration Based On The Real Advisory, Names Redacted)
An advisory’s drip plan for the coming days (left) and the satellite crop-health map (right). Illustration based on the grower’s real advisory screens; field names and dates are hidden.

A season of advisories, from harvest to dormancy

The advisories followed the bushes through two harvests and one winter. We used the advisories whose growth stage matched an Oregon season and left out a few weeks in early 2026 when the stage labels ran ahead of the calendar. That left 120 advisories.

Months Main stage reported What the advisories focused on
Jul to Aug Harvest Fruit pests, fruit rots, the most water of the year
Sep to Oct Post-harvest growth Root rot and root weevil watch, canopy recovery
Nov to Jan Dormancy Root rot, mummy berry, cane disease, almost no water
Apr Bud swell to fruit set Mummy berry, gall midge, aphids
Jun Ripening, early harvest Fruit pests return, water rises again

The canopy readings tell the same story. During the 2026 harvest the field’s NDVI mostly sat between 0.41 and 0.51 in July and August, against 0.70 to 0.85 the advisories expect at that stage. It dipped to 0.32 to 0.37 in late August as picking ended, then climbed back to 0.54 to 0.59 by mid-October. That recovery was real but stopped short of the 0.65 to 0.80 range for post-harvest growth.

What NDVI values from โˆ’1 to +1 mean on a real field

โ–ถ What NDVI values from โˆ’1 to +1 mean on a real field ยท 2:33

Blueberry root rot risk after harvest

Phytophthora root rot was the threat that set this field’s autumn apart. It did not appear in any advisory during the 2026 harvest. It came back on 1 September 2026 with a score of 82%, and stayed between 66% and 82% through 18 October. In 2025 it followed the same pattern: first flagged on 18 July as harvest wound down, then in 39 advisories up to mid-December, rated high in early August and late November.

Chart

Phytophthora root rot score after the 2026 harvest

Modelled risk in each advisory that flagged it, %, Sepโ€“Oct 2026

0%25%50%75%100%1 Sep5 Sep11 Sep8 Oct11 Oct15 Oct18 OctPhytophthora root rot 70%Source: Farmonaut advisory records for a Willamette Valley blueberry field, Sepโ€“Oct 2026.
0%25%50%75%100%1 Sep11 Sep11 Oct18 OctPhytophthora root rot70%Source: Farmonaut advisory records for a Willamette Valleyblueberry field, Sepโ€“Oct 2026.
The score returned at 82% on 1 September, the first flag since harvest began, and stayed high into October.

The timing fits what plant pathologists know about the disease. The Pacific Northwest Plant Disease Management Handbook explains that blueberry plants generally have two main root growth peaks, one in spring and another in late summer after harvest. The handbook advises timing protective treatments just before these peaks. It also notes that the pathogen spreads in water and soil, and that root rot is much more severe in poorly drained, heavy soils.

Three signals drove the score on this field. The canopy stayed below its expected range for weeks. Radar soil moisture read high, between 0.71 and 0.81 on the advisory scale in October. And the bushes are young, which matters because the handbook says the disease is often a problem of young plants during establishment. Older bushes with bigger root systems cope better on a well-drained site.

What the advisory recommended

The advisory gave both an organic and a conventional option, a phosphonate drench and a mefenoxam drench, and asked the grower to rotate between product groups. It paired them with cultural steps: improve drainage, keep raised beds, avoid over-watering, and correct fertility to rebuild the canopy. Always follow the product label and local rules. The handbook also notes that the fungicides used against Phytophthora protect roots but do not kill the organism, which is why drainage and water timing carry so much weight.

Oregon State University Extension gives the drainage numbers. Its blueberry guide says the soil water table should be at least 14 inches below the soil surface, that roots suffocate in soil water-logged for more than a few days in a row, and that raised beds about 1 to 1.5 feet high help drainage.

Root weevils

Root weevils joined the list in September 2026, with scores of 52% to 68%. The Pacific Northwest Insect Management Handbook says black vine weevil is probably the most common weevil in blueberries, that larvae feeding on roots can stunt young plants, and that beneficial nematodes have shown some effect as a drench in the fall. Adults notch leaves at night, so a torch check on a calm evening confirms them. The advisory’s organic option was beneficial nematodes, which matches that timing.

How satellite soil moisture compares with a soil probe

โ–ถ How satellite soil moisture compares with a soil probe ยท 2:11

Risk by stage: what the advisories flagged and when

Across the 120 advisories, the threats changed with the stage. Spotted-wing drosophila and fruit rots led during harvest. Root rot and root weevils took over after harvest. Mummy berry and cane disease led over winter and into bloom.

Chart

How often each threat was flagged

Share of 120 advisories, selected threats, Jun 2025โ€“Oct 2026

0%25%50%75%100%Spotted-wing drosophila82%Anthracnose58%Botrytis50%Mummy berry39%Phytophthora root rot38%Aphids24%Bacterial canker11%Source: Farmonaut advisory records for a Willamette Valley blueberry field, Jun 2025โ€“Oct 2026.
0%25%50%75%100%Spotted-wing drosophila82%Anthracnose58%Botrytis50%Mummy berry39%Phytophthora root rot38%Aphids24%Bacterial canker11%Source: Farmonaut advisory records for a Willamette Valleyblueberry field, Jun 2025โ€“Oct 2026.
Fruit pests and rots were flagged most often; root rot was flagged mainly after harvest and over winter.
Stage Months Top modelled risks (monthly average score)
Bud swell to fruit set Apr 2026 Mummy berry 93%, gall midge 90%, anthracnose 83%
Harvest Jun to Aug 2026 Spotted-wing drosophila 92% to 97%, anthracnose 89% to 92%, botrytis 78% to 87%
After harvest Sep to Oct 2026 Phytophthora root rot 72% to 76%, root weevil 54% to 65%, spotted-wing drosophila 72% to 84%
Dormancy Nov 2025 to Jan 2026 Mummy berry 80% to 96%, bacterial canker 76% to 90%, Phytophthora root rot 71% to 75%

Each score is a modelled probability built from the field’s canopy, moisture and weather data. It tells the grower where and when to look first. It does not confirm that a pest or disease is present. The pest card on the app makes this point too: the percentage is the chance of an attack in the coming week, not the share of the field affected.

Blueberry Root Rot And Pest Risk Scores From A Farmonaut Advisory, Including Phytophthora Root Rot, Annual Bluegrass And Root Weevils (Illustration Based On The Real Advisory)
The pest, disease and weed card scores each threat and gives an organic and a conventional option. Illustration based on the grower’s real advisory screens; field names and dates are hidden.

Water: planned dry days in a wet autumn

The irrigation part of each advisory plans a drip amount for each of the next several days. When advisories overlapped, we kept the newest plan for each day. Across the 382 planned days we kept, the advisories planned no water on 179, or 46.9%.

Chart

Rainfall vs planned drip by month

Inches per month; NOAA normal rainfall at Salem vs the advisory plan

0.00 in2.00 in4.00 in6.00 in8.00 inJunJulAugSepOctNovDecNormal rainfall 6.97 inPlanned drip 0.51 inSource: NOAA NCEI 1991โ€“2020 Climate Normals, Salem McNary Field (USW00024232); Farmonaut advisory records, Jun 2025โ€“Oct 2026(Junโ€“Oct averaged over both years).
0.00 in2.00 in4.00 in6.00 in8.00 inJunAugOctDecNormal rainfallPlanned drip6.97 in0.51 inSource: NOAA NCEI 1991โ€“2020 Climate Normals, Salem McNaryField (USW00024232); Farmonaut advisory records, Jun 2025โ€“Oct2026 (Junโ€“Oct averaged over both years).
The plan added the most water in the dry summer and cut back as autumn rain returned.

Local weather explains the shape of the plan. At Salem’s McNary Field, the NOAA 1991โ€“2020 climate normals give just 0.25 inches of rain in July and 0.39 inches in August, then 3.47 inches in October, 5.95 inches in November and 6.97 inches in December, out of 40.08 inches a year. The plan put the most water on the bushes in the dry summer months, about 3.8 inches (97 mm) in July, and cut back as the rain returned, to about 0.5 inches (13 mm) in December.

The plan also followed the crop’s water curve. The FAO irrigation guide gives berry bushes a crop coefficient of 0.30 at the start of the season, 1.05 in mid-season and 0.50 at the end. In this record the share of dry days rose from 29% to 35% in July to about half of all days in October, 77% in December, and every day in early January.

Planned water compared with a daily routine

To compare, we worked out what the field would have received with its own average watering dose every day. Across the June to December 2025 window the plan came to 13.5 inches (343 mm), against 23.9 inches (606 mm) with a same-dose daily routine. Across June to October 2026 it came to 10.9 inches (277 mm), against 20.0 inches (508 mm). That is 43% to 45% less water in each window. This is a comparison of plans, not a metered saving, but it shows how much of the season’s water depends on timing.

For root rot, timing matters as much as volume. The disease handbook warns against over-irrigating drip fields so that soil stays saturated for 48 hours or more, and advises deep watering with drying between irrigations. The latest October advisory did exactly that: it planned water every second day and skipped the days in between, because radar soil moisture was already high. One way to use the plan well is to check it against your own rain gauge in autumn, and skip a planned watering after a real soaking.

Chart

Planned water vs a same-dose daily routine

Inches of water per window, whole field

0.0 in6.2 in12.5 in18.8 in25.0 inPlan, Junโ€“Dec 202513.5 inSame dose, Junโ€“Dec 202523.9 inPlan, Apr 20261.6 inSame dose, Apr 20263.4 inPlan, Junโ€“Oct 202610.9 inSame dose, Junโ€“Oct 202620.0 inSource: Farmonaut advisory records for a Willamette Valley blueberry field, 2025โ€“2026.
0.0 in6.2 in12.5 in18.8 in25.0 inPlan, Junโ€“Dec 202513.5 inSame dose, Junโ€“Dec 202523.9 inPlan, Apr 20261.6 inSame dose, Apr 20263.4 inPlan, Junโ€“Oct 202610.9 inSame dose, Junโ€“Oct 202620.0 inSource: Farmonaut advisory records for a Willamette Valleyblueberry field, 2025โ€“2026.
In each window the plan was 43% to 52% below the field’s own same-dose routine (1 inch = 25.4 mm).

Nutrition and soil

The fertilizer part of each advisory compares the field’s modelled nutrient levels with the ideal range for the current stage, then gives a rate for each nutrient that is short. Across the 120 advisories there were 600 nutrient lines, and 585 of them (97.5%) named an organic source as well as a conventional fertilizer.

How a Farmonaut satellite farm advisory is read, section by section

โ–ถ How a Farmonaut satellite farm advisory is read, section by section ยท 9:13

After the 2026 harvest the advisory held all fertilizer, because the bushes were in a stage that responds little to feeding. It still flagged potassium as the largest gap, at about 61 ppm against an ideal of 100 to 150 ppm, with phosphorus just below its range. That fits the handbook’s advice for root rot sites: do not overfeed nitrogen, and keep phosphorus and potassium up because they appear to help root growth. The advisory marked potassium and phosphorus as the priority for the next feeding window in late winter and spring.

The soil card rated the field’s pH at mostly 4.8 to 5.5, inside the 4.5 to 5.5 range that Oregon State University recommends for blueberries, with low salinity. Organic carbon was rated low. That is why the advisories leaned on acidic organic options such as pine bark or sawdust mulch, which also improve soil aeration around the roots. The yield card gave a modelled estimate for the next harvest, not a forecast.

Blueberry Fertilizer Plan With Organic And Chemical Options, Soil Ph And Yield Cards From A Farmonaut Advisory (Illustration Based On The Real Advisory, Names Redacted)
The fertilizer card holds feeding after harvest but flags the gaps; the soil and yield cards sit alongside. Illustration based on the grower’s real advisory screens; field names and dates are hidden.

What other blueberry growers can take from it

Four lessons on blueberry root rot, water and feeding stand out from this field’s 16 months of data.

  • Watch the weeks after harvest. Root rot risk stayed silent during peak picking and rose as harvest wound down in both years, just before the late-summer root growth peak.
  • Read canopy and soil moisture together. A canopy that stays below its expected NDVI while the soil reads wet is the pattern that points to roots, not to a lack of water.
  • Let the rain do the work in autumn. The plan cut water as rain returned and left about half of autumn days dry, which suits a disease that thrives in saturated soil.
  • Feed the roots, not the leaves. Potassium and phosphorus were flagged ahead of nitrogen, in line with regional advice for root rot sites.

If you grow blueberries, the calculator below gives a rough idea of what a patch weakened by blueberry root rot could cost at your own yield and price. For a warmer-climate comparison, see our Florida blueberry advisory case study, or try the Farmonaut Satellite + AI Farm Monitoring System on your own fields.

Try the numbers for your own farm below.

Calculator

What could a root rot patch cost on your blueberry field?

Enter your own acres, yield and price, plus the share of the field you think is weak and the loss you expect there.

acres

lb/acre

USD/lb

%

%
$8,775value of fruit at risk
  • Weak area: 2.0 acres
  • Fruit at risk: 7,500 lb
  • Value at risk per field acre: $439
  • Whole-field crop value: $292,500

Example values only, not a forecast. The default yield and price are USDA NASS averages for Oregon cultivated blueberries in 2025 (12,500 lb per acre, $1.17 per pound); the weak share and loss are round examples. Replace all five with your own numbers.

FAQ

What causes blueberry root rot?

In the Pacific Northwest it is mainly caused by Phytophthora cinnamomi, a fungus-like organism that lives in soil and spreads in water. It does most damage in wet, poorly drained, heavy soils and on young plants. Good drainage, raised beds and careful watering are the main defences.

Can a satellite see Phytophthora root rot?

Not directly. A satellite sees the canopy, not the roots. The advisory combines a canopy that stays thin with wet soil readings, the growth stage and local disease lists to score the risk. The grower then digs and checks the roots on the ground.

Why does root rot risk rise after harvest?

Blueberries put on a second flush of roots in late summer after harvest, and autumn rain returns in western Oregon. New roots in wet soil are what the pathogen needs, so regional guidance times protective steps just before that root growth peak.

How often does a blueberry field get a new advisory?

In this case study the field received an advisory about every three days, 155 in total from June 2025 to October 2026.

Should I cut irrigation if my field has root rot risk?

Not to zero, but avoid keeping the soil saturated. Regional guidance advises deep watering with drying between irrigations, and no drip schedule that leaves soil saturated for 48 hours or more. Check your own rain gauge in autumn and skip a planned watering after a heavy rain.

Authored by: Farmonaut Research & Content Team

Reviewed and verified by: Farmonaut Agricultural Experts Team

Reviewed October 2026 against the Pacific Northwest Plant Disease and Insect Management Handbooks, Oregon State University Extension EM 9179, USDA NASS Noncitrus Fruits and Nuts summaries, NOAA NCEI 1991โ€“2020 normals for Salem, FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56, and ESA and NASA mission pages, plus the 155 advisories behind this case study.

Farmonaut berry monitoring

Get a field-by-field plan for your blueberries

Draw your fields once, and Farmonaut sends a satellite-based irrigation, nutrient and pest and disease risk plan for each one every few days on web, Android or iOS.

Open The Farmonaut Crop Monitoring Web AppGet The Farmonaut App On Google PlayGet The Farmonaut App On The App Store
Farmonaut Web App With A Satellite Crop Health Map

Sources

  1. Farmonaut advisory records for a Willamette Valley blueberry field (2025โ€“2026): sat.farmonaut.com
  2. USDA NASS, Noncitrus Fruits and Nuts 2025 Summary (May 2026): esmis.nal.usda.gov
  3. USDA NASS, Noncitrus Fruits and Nuts 2024 Summary (May 2025): esmis.nal.usda.gov
  4. Pacific Northwest Plant Disease Management Handbook, Blueberry root rot (revised March 2026): pnwhandbooks.org
  5. Pacific Northwest Insect Management Handbook, Blueberry root weevil: pnwhandbooks.org
  6. Oregon State University Extension, Growing Berries on the Oregon Coast: Blueberries, EM 9179 (2018, reviewed 2022): extension.oregonstate.edu
  7. NOAA NCEI, 1991โ€“2020 monthly normals, Salem McNary Field (USW00024232): ncei.noaa.gov
  8. NOAA NCEI, U.S. Climate Normals: ncei.noaa.gov
  9. FAO, Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56, Chapter 6 crop coefficients (1998): fao.org
  10. ESA, Sentinel-2 facts and figures: esa.int
  11. NASA Earth Observatory, Measuring vegetation (NDVI and EVI): science.nasa.gov


Discussion

Questions, corrections or field experience? Share them below. First-time comments are reviewed before they appear, and your email is never published.

No comments yet. Be the first to add a question or your experience.

Leave a comment

Farmonaut Farmonaut Trusted by 200,000+ users and 100+ businesses 200,000+ users trust us Get started