A geophysical survey measures a physical property of the Earth over an area: magnetism, density, electrical conductivity, chargeability, natural radioactivity or seismic velocity. Geologists use the result to infer the rocks, structures and possible mineralisation hidden below soil, sand, water or younger rock. In mineral exploration it is the bridge between surface mapping and drilling. It tells you where the geology changes underground and which of those changes deserve a drill hole.

Try it: Airborne survey line-kilometre and budget estimator →

No single method finds every deposit. Gold in a shear zone, copper in a porphyry, nickel sulphide in a mafic intrusion and a heavy-mineral sand all show up in different physical properties. Choosing the right geophysics for mineral exploration starts with a clear idea of the target, the host rocks and the cover. Geophysics sits in the middle of the wider mineral exploration sequence, after mapping and before drilling. We take each method in turn, then show how to build a program that spends money only where it matters.

“Airborne radiometric surveys read gamma rays from roughly the top 30 centimetres of soil and rock.”

How a geophysical survey works: physical properties and contrasts

Every geophysical survey follows the same logic. A sensor measures a field or a response at many points, along flight lines, on a ground grid or down a borehole. The data are corrected for known effects such as aircraft height, terrain, daily variation or instrument drift. What remains is an anomaly map: the places where the property is higher or lower than expected. Geophysicists then model those anomalies in 2D or 3D to estimate the shape, depth and strength of the source.

Methods fall into two families. Passive methods measure natural fields: the Earth’s magnetic field, gravity, natural gamma radiation, and the natural electric and magnetic variations used in magnetotellurics. Active methods put energy into the ground and measure the response: electrical current for resistivity and IP, a transmitted electromagnetic signal for EM, sound waves for seismic, and radar pulses for GPR. Active methods usually cost more per kilometre but can be tuned to the target.

• Magnetic: measures variations in the Earth’s magnetic field caused mainly by magnetite in the rocks.
• Gravity: measures small changes in gravitational acceleration caused by density differences.
• Radiometric: measures natural gamma rays from potassium, uranium and thorium at the surface.
• Electromagnetic (EM): induces currents in conductive rocks and measures the secondary field.
• Resistivity and IP: injects current to measure how easily rocks conduct and how much charge they hold.
• Seismic: times sound waves reflected or refracted by layers and structures.
• Ground-penetrating radar: sends radar pulses into the shallow subsurface and records the echoes.

Potential-field methods: magnetic and gravity surveys

Magnetic surveys

The magnetic method is usually the first geophysical survey flown over a new district. It is fast, relatively cheap per line-kilometre and very good at mapping geology under cover. The US Geological Survey describes aeromagnetic anomalies as variations in the Earth’s field caused by the uneven distribution of magnetic minerals, primarily magnetite, in the upper crust. The patterns reveal buried faults, magnetite-bearing rocks and the thickness of generally non-magnetic sedimentary cover. Our guide to geomagnetic survey specifications covers line spacing, flying height and map products.

For explorers, that means magnetics maps the architecture: greenstone belts, intrusions, dykes, shear zones and folds. Hydrothermal alteration can destroy or create magnetite, so a magnetic “low” along a fault can be as interesting as a “high”. Surveys are flown by fixed-wing aircraft, helicopters or drones, and walked on the ground with a magnetometer for detailed follow-up.

Line spacing is the specification that matters most. Geoscience Australia’s magnetics page notes that before 1990 most Australian surveys were flown at 1,500 m spacing or wider, while surveys since 1990 have usually used 400 m or less, at under 100 m above ground. Its national grids draw on 33.5 million line-kilometres from more than 1,200 surveys (figures as published on that page; check it for newer grid editions). Its airborne EM page gives the two extremes for EM: about 200 m for targeted company surveys, and 20 km for the national AusAEM program.

Spacing converts directly into line-kilometres, and line-kilometres are what contractors price. The estimator below turns an area and a spacing into flown kilometres, then applies your own quoted rate. We don’t put a default price in it; rates move with fuel, aircraft availability and terrain, and only a current quote is worth using.

Gravity surveys

A gravity survey measures tiny changes in the pull of gravity caused by differences in rock density. The US EPA’s gravity-method page explains that it records how subsurface density variations affect gravitational acceleration, measured with a gravimeter in Gal units (0.01 m/s²); practical surveys work in milliGal or microGal because the anomalies are so small. After corrections for latitude, elevation and terrain, the result is usually shown as a Bouguer anomaly map.

How small is small? A University of British Columbia course note on gravity puts the Earth’s total pull at about 978,000 mGal at the equator, and says ore bodies in mineral exploration may cause anomalies of around 1 mGal. Latitude alone changes gravity by roughly 5,000 mGal from equator to pole, and Earth tides by up to 0.3 mGal. That is why gravity survey geophysics lives or dies on its corrections.

Dense bodies such as massive sulphides, iron ore and mafic intrusions produce gravity highs, while sedimentary basins and some altered zones produce lows. A ground gravity survey collects readings at stations, and each station needs a very precise elevation, which is why gravity is slower on the ground than magnetics. Airborne gravity and gravity gradiometry cover larger areas faster. Geoscience Australia’s national gravity grid combines 1,430,447 ground observations with 451,000 line-km of airborne gravity and gradiometry (as stated on its gravity page; the grid is updated as surveys are added).

Radiometric surveys: mapping the surface chemistry from the air

A radiometric, or gamma-ray spectrometric, survey is passive. A crystal detector in an aircraft counts natural gamma rays and splits them by energy into potassium, uranium and thorium channels. Geoscience Australia describes radiometrics as estimating the concentrations of these three radioelements. Gamma rays travel only a short distance through rock, so the signal comes from roughly the top 30 centimetres of soil and rock. Surveys are typically flown 40–150 metres above the ground.

• Potassium highs can outline potassic alteration around porphyry and some gold systems.
• Thorium and potassium ratios help separate granite phases and map regolith.
• Uranium channel is a direct first-pass tool in uranium exploration.
• ⚠ Limitation: it is a surface method. Transported cover, water and dense vegetation mask the signal from bedrock.

Magnetics and radiometrics are usually flown together on the same aircraft, which is why many geological surveys publish them as a pair.

Electrical and electromagnetic methods: EM, MT, resistivity and IP

Electromagnetic surveys

Geoscience Australia describes airborne electromagnetics (AEM) as transmitting a signal from a system on a plane or helicopter; a secondary field is induced in conductive rocks and measured from the same aircraft. Conductors include massive sulphides, graphite, saline groundwater and clay-rich regolith. Time-domain and frequency-domain systems exist in the air and on the ground, and downhole EM tests whether a drill hole narrowly missed a conductor. For system choice and depth of investigation, see our guide to TEM, VTEM and CSAMT surveys.

Magnetotellurics

Magnetotellurics (MT) is passive. It uses natural time variations of the Earth’s magnetic and electric fields to measure resistivity at depth. It sees much deeper than most EM systems and is used to map crustal-scale structures that may have channelled mineralising fluids.

Resistivity and induced polarisation

Resistivity and IP are the workhorses of ground-based sulphide exploration. Current is injected through electrodes, and the voltage is measured while the current flows (resistivity) and after it switches off (chargeability, the IP effect). Finely disseminated sulphides produce strong IP responses, which is why the method has been central to porphyry copper exploration since the 1950s and is widely used for intrusion-related gold and IOCG targets. Clays and graphite can respond too, a common source of false targets. Modern DCIP surveys are often inverted in 3D. Our resistivity and IP survey guide goes through arrays, chargeability and SP.

Geophysical survey instruments at a glance

Most of what a contractor brings to site falls into a handful of instrument types. Knowing them helps you read a proposal and ask the right questions about sensitivity and data quality.

• 🧲 Magnetometers measure the strength of the magnetic field. A second, stationary base-station magnetometer records daily variation so it can be removed from the survey data.
• ⚖ Gravimeters measure tiny differences in gravitational acceleration. Readings are tied to base stations and paired with high-precision GPS elevations.
• ☢ Gamma-ray spectrometers are large detector crystals that count gamma rays and sort them into potassium, uranium and thorium energy windows.
• 📡 EM transmitters and receivers are loops or coils that send a signal and record the ground’s secondary response, on aircraft, on the ground or down a drill hole.
• 🔌 Resistivity/IP systems pair a transmitter that drives current through electrodes with multichannel receivers that record voltage and decay.
• 📶 Seismographs and GPR units use geophones for seismic waves and antennas of a chosen frequency for radar.

Geophysical seismic surveys and ground-penetrating radar

A seismic survey sends sound waves into the ground and times their return from layers and structures. Geoscience Australia calls seismic (refraction, reflection and passive methods) the principal geophysical method it uses to image the Earth’s crust at depth; its 2015 Boulia land survey alone acquired 700 km of deep crustal seismic in Queensland. In mineral exploration, reflection seismic is expensive and used mainly for deep structural targets and mine-scale planning. Refraction is cheaper and useful for cover thickness and bedrock depth. Passive seismic uses ambient noise to estimate depth to bedrock quickly.

Ground-penetrating radar works at the other end of the depth scale. The US EPA’s GPR page notes typical systems operate between 25 and 1,500 MHz and that penetration can reach tens of metres in ideal materials such as dry sand and gravel. In conductive ground (saturated clays or saline water) the depth of investigation can shrink to centimetres. GPR is valuable for mapping shallow layers and old channels, not for finding ore at depth.

“In saturated clay or saline ground, radar penetration can shrink to centimetres, according to the US EPA.”

Planning a geophysical survey program: from satellite to drill

The most efficient programs are staged, moving from cheap, wide coverage to expensive, focused work. Each stage narrows the ground so the next, costlier method is used only where it is justified.

1. Desktop and satellite screening. Compile public geological maps (our guide to geological mapping methods and scales covers how to read them) and any government geophysics, then screen the whole area with satellite imagery for alteration and structure.
2. Regional airborne survey. Magnetics and radiometrics, sometimes EM, at wide line spacing to map geology under cover.
3. Target-scale ground geophysical surveys. Detailed ground magnetics, gravity, IP or EM grids over the best anomalies.
4. Integrated 3D modelling. Joint interpretation of geophysics, geochemistry and geology to rank targets.
5. Drill testing. Holes designed to intersect the modelled source, often followed by downhole EM or other borehole geophysics.

Borehole geophysics

Once holes are drilled, probes lowered down the hole measure the same properties at close range: natural gamma, density, magnetic susceptibility, resistivity and downhole EM. Borehole data calibrate the surface geophysical survey, showing what a given anomaly actually corresponds to in the rock. Downhole EM can also detect a conductor that a hole passed close to but missed.

Choosing geophysics for mineral exploration by deposit type

The table above is organised by method. Owners usually think the other way round, starting from the commodity. These pairings are common starting points, but the host geology always decides the final program.

• Orogenic gold: magnetics for shear zones and folds, IP for associated sulphides, radiometrics for potassic alteration; satellite mapping for iron-oxide and clay alteration at surface.
• Porphyry copper-gold: magnetics for the intrusive centre, IP for the sulphide shell, radiometrics for potassic cores; satellite SWIR data for clay-sericite zoning.
• Massive sulphides (VMS, nickel): EM for conductive bodies, gravity for dense lenses, downhole EM around drill holes.
• Iron ore: magnetics and gravity, since magnetite and hematite ores are dense and often strongly magnetic.
• Uranium: radiometrics first, then EM or resistivity to map the host structures and conductors.
• Placer and paleochannel gold: passive seismic, GPR or resistivity to map channel geometry and depth to bedrock.

3D geophysical surveys and inversion

A 3D geophysical survey usually means a survey designed and processed to produce a volume model rather than a flat map. Inversion software searches for a distribution of physical properties underground that would reproduce the measured data. The output, a block of predicted susceptibility, density, conductivity or chargeability, can be sliced, contoured and loaded into the same 3D environment as the geology and drill holes.

Inversion is powerful but it is still a model. Different starting assumptions give different answers, and the results are most reliable near the survey lines and at shallow to moderate depth. Constrain inversions with known geology, rock-property measurements from core and, where available, drill intersections.

Reading a geophysical map

Most owners first meet their geophysical map as a colourful image in a report. A few habits make these maps far more useful. Check the colour stretch and legend; a strong-looking red spot can be a small absolute change. Look for linear breaks and offsets, which often mark faults. Compare the anomaly with topography and cultural features such as power lines, fences and roads, which can create false responses. Then ask whether the anomaly has been modelled and at what depth its source sits.

What drives geophysical survey cost, and how satellite screening cuts it

Contractors quote a geophysical survey per line-kilometre (airborne and most ground methods), per station (gravity) or per crew-day, plus mobilisation, processing and reporting. Prices move with fuel, aircraft availability, terrain, remoteness and the specification, so check any published rate against current quotes. The biggest lever you control is how much ground each expensive method has to cover.

• Area and line spacing: halving line spacing roughly doubles line-kilometres (the estimator above shows it).
• Terrain and access: mountains, forest and swamps slow ground crews and raise airborne costs.
• Mobilisation: getting aircraft or crews to remote sites is a fixed cost that favours doing more in one campaign.
• Processing and 3D inversion: worth paying for, but scope it clearly.
• ✔ Targeting first: a ranked target map lets you fly or walk detailed surveys only over the best zones.

That last point is where we fit. Our satellite-based mineral detection analyses multispectral and hyperspectral imagery of your boundary to flag likely mineralised target zones, alteration halos and structures such as faults and fractures. It does not replace magnetics, gravity or IP. It tells you where to point them.

• ✔ Input: coordinates, KML/KMZ or a polygon, plus country and target mineral.
• ✔ Turnaround: 5–20 business days depending on size and mineral complexity.
• 📊 Deliverables: prospectivity heatmaps, high-potential zones with estimated location and depth ranges, geological interpretation, and PDF plus georeferenced GIS files your geophysicist can overlay on survey data.
• Premium+: TargetMax™ drilling intelligence with drilling-angle recommendations and 3D subsurface models.
• 📊 Economics: timelines from months to days, and up to 80–85% lower early-exploration cost.

See a sample of the satellite-driven 3D mineral prospectivity mapping output, or request a price through our mining query form. We have scanned 100,000+ hectares for 20+ mineral types across 25+ countries.

Start with free government geophysics

Before commissioning any new work, check what already exists. Geoscience Australia and the Australian state and territory geological surveys publish regional magnetic, radiometric, gravity and airborne EM data, and many other national surveys do the same. Regional grids are usually too coarse for drill targeting, but they show the big structures and help you decide where a new, tighter geophysical survey will add the most.

Geophysical testing and investigation outside exploration

The same tools are used for geophysical testing and geophysical investigation in engineering and environmental work: finding bedrock depth for foundations, locating voids and karst, mapping groundwater and landfills, and checking tailings dams. The US EPA lists bedrock depth, void detection, landfill mapping and site characterisation among typical gravity applications, and the UBC notes put a geotechnical gravity target at around 20 microGal. For a mine, this matters at the development stage, when geotechnical and hydrogeological consultants reuse exploration geophysics for infrastructure siting.

Choosing geophysical survey companies

Need geophysical survey services in Australia, Canada or the Middle East and North Africa? The same checks apply to any firm offering geophysical surveying and mapping services. Ask for comparable surveys in similar terrain and target type, the exact instrument specifications, the QA/QC procedure (repeat lines, base-station records, noise levels), the processing and inversion deliverables, and who will interpret the data. Separate the acquisition contract from interpretation if you want an independent read, for example from one of the mining consultants who sign CP and QP reports.

• Specify the deliverables: raw and processed data in open formats, grids, profiles, inversion models and a logistics report.
• Define line direction and spacing based on the strike of the target geology.
• ⚠ Check permits: low-level flying, drone operations and ground access usually need approvals and landholder consent.

Guides in this series

Four guides take single methods from this geophysical survey overview further.

• Geomagnetic survey specs: ground and aeromagnetic grids, line spacing, flying height and the maps you should get back.
• Electromagnetic survey methods: TEM, VTEM and CSAMT systems and how deep each one sees.
• Electrical resistivity geophysics: electrode arrays, IP chargeability and self potential.
• Airborne geophysical survey platforms and contractors: helicopter, fixed-wing and drone options, survey specs and how to pick a contractor.

Frequently asked questions

Reviewed September 2026 against Geoscience Australia’s magnetics, gravity, radiometrics, airborne electromagnetics and seismic pages, the USGS aeromagnetic description, the US EPA’s gravity and ground-penetrating radar pages, and the University of British Columbia EOSC 350 gravity notes.

Survey pricing varies with market conditions, terrain and specification; obtain current quotes from contractors. National data volumes and line spacings are as published by Geoscience Australia when checked. Anomalies from any geophysical or satellite survey are exploration targets, not mineral resources, and must be tested by sampling and drilling.