Reviewed September 2026 against USGS Mineral Commodity Summaries and Dallas Federal Reserve research on US lithium economics.

Try it: Run your own numbers →

“More than half of global lithium supply comes from brine extraction — 407,000 tonnes LCE out of roughly 290,000 tonnes of total production-equivalent metal in 2025 traces back to salar evaporation, concentrated in arid basins where water is already contested.”
“US lithium mine production reached only 4,000 tonnes in 2024, against measured and indicated domestic resources of roughly 30 million tonnes — the gap between what the US could produce and what it actually mines is the real story of the sector.”

Table of Contents

Introduction: Lithium Brine Deposits and the Water Question

Lithium brine deposits supply the majority of the world’s lithium, and that majority is extracted by evaporating groundwater in some of the driest basins on the planet. The Dallas Federal Reserve’s 2025 analysis of the lithium economy puts brine’s share of global supply at 407,000 tonnes LCE against total production of approximately 290,000 tonnes of lithium metal-equivalent in 2025 — the two figures use different units (lithium carbonate equivalent versus contained metal) but both point the same direction: brine dominates, and brine means water.

This matters most where lithium basins sit next to farmland. Chile’s Salar de Atacama, Argentina’s salars, and the emerging brine projects in Nevada and California’s Salton Sea all draw from aquifers that also feed irrigation wells. Meanwhile the United States mined only 4,000 tonnes of lithium in 2024, per USGS Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026 — a small fraction of a domestic resource base the same USGS dataset estimates at roughly 30 million tonnes of measured and indicated lithium across all deposit types. That gap between resource and production is the practical question underneath every search for “lithium brine deposits”: there is a lot of lithium in the ground, most of it undeveloped, and the deposits that would close the gap fastest are also the most water-intensive.

This article covers where lithium brine deposits sit globally, how they compare to US hard rock and brine projects on water and land impact, and — because the phrase turns up in search alongside lithium and mining — what “core-harvesting initiative” actually refers to (a narrower and more literal answer than the phrase suggests, covered in its own section below).

Global lithium production vs brine-sourced supply, 2023–2025 0 200k 400k Tonnes 290k Production (2025) 407k Brine LCE (2023) Dallas Federal Reserve, Oct 2025

Global Lithium Deposits: Hard Rock & Brine Paradigms

Global lithium deposits fall into two geological paradigms, and which one a given basin belongs to determines almost everything downstream — extraction cost, water draw, permitting timeline, and environmental review.

  • ✔ Hard Rock Deposits: Found in pegmatites — igneous rock formations rich in lithium-bearing minerals like spodumene and lepidolite. Major deposits are worked in Australia, Canada, China, and parts of Africa.
  • ✔ Lithium Brine Deposits: Hosted in high-altitude salt flats — “salars” — concentrated across South America’s Lithium Triangle (Chile, Argentina, Bolivia). Lithium sits dissolved in saline groundwater beneath the salt crust.

Distinct Geologies & Extraction Paradigms

  • 📊 Hard Rock: Extraction involves mining, crushing, and chemical processing to yield a lithium mineral concentrate suitable for refining into battery-grade compounds.
  • 📊 Brine: Lithium-laden brines are pumped to the surface and evaporated in large ponds. As water evaporates — a process that commonly runs 18 months or longer — the brine concentrates, allowing lithium compounds to be precipitated out.

Per the Dallas Fed’s October 2025 research note, brine-sourced supply of 407,000 tonnes LCE represents the larger share of global lithium output, concentrated almost entirely in arid regions where agriculture already competes for scarce water. That concentration — rather than brine extraction being inherently worse per tonne — is what makes the water question geographically specific: a brine project in a well-watered basin poses a different risk profile than the same technology in the Atacama.

Global Distribution & Strategic Importance

  • ✔ Chile, Argentina, Bolivia — Lithium Triangle: home to the largest brine deposits, supplying a large share of global brine output.
  • ✔ Australia: dominates hard rock mining through high-grade spodumene deposits.
  • ✔ China: works both brine (Qinghai-Tibet plateau) and hard rock reserves.
  • ✔ US Lithium Deposit: emerging resources in Nevada (Clayton Valley, Thacker Pass), North Carolina (Carolina Tin-Spodumene Belt), and California (Salton Sea geothermal brines).

For US-based investors and land managers, the strategic case rests on the resource-to-production gap noted above: 30 million tonnes of measured and indicated domestic resource against only 4,000 tonnes of 2024 mine production. The USGS dataset on lithium deposits in the United States breaks that resource down by deposit type and state, and is the reference to check for an updated figure as new projects report reserves.

Key Insight:

Lithium extraction method and regional geology — not global averages — determine water use, surface disturbance, and downstream environmental impact. Evaluate each project against the specific basin’s water balance, not a sector-wide figure.

US Lithium Deposit: Regional Dynamics, Opportunities & Challenges

The US lithium deposit landscape is expanding as domestic energy-storage demand grows, but production remains small relative to resource size — 4,000 tonnes mined in 2024 against USGS’s ~30 million tonne resource estimate. Major projects in Nevada (Thacker Pass, Clayton Valley) and California’s Salton Sea illustrate three different extraction geologies within one country.

Key US Lithium Deposit Regions

  • ✔ Clayton Valley, Nevada: the only currently operating lithium brine facility in the US, using solar evaporation.
  • ✔ Thacker Pass, Nevada: lithium-bearing sedimentary claystones, a hard rock/clay hybrid resource.
  • ✔ North Carolina: historic hard rock pegmatite production, with new exploration underway.
  • ✔ Salton Sea, California: direct lithium extraction from geothermal brines, promising lower surface impact and use of co-located geothermal power.

As the US lithium deposit sector expands, land allocation and agricultural risk are the recurring permitting concerns, particularly across the arid West where irrigated farmland and prospective brine or claystone resources overlap. Project-level environmental impact statements are the authoritative source for acreage figures on any specific proposal — the USGS resource dataset above does not itself quantify agricultural land at risk, so treat any acreage figure as belonging to a named project’s own filing, not to the sector as a whole.

Extraction Methods: Environmental Footprints & Processing

Extraction method — hard rock or brine — dictates energy use, capital intensity, processing timeline, and environmental footprint.

Hard Rock (Pegmatite) Mining

  • ✔ Open-pit or underground mining of pegmatite ores.
  • ✔ Ore is crushed, milled, and subjected to flotation or gravity separation to produce a mineral concentrate.
  • ✔ Concentrate undergoes chemical refining into battery-grade lithium carbonate or hydroxide.
  • ⚠ Risk: high surface disturbance, substantial waste rock, and tailings storage requirements.

Brine Extraction Systems

  • ✔ Saline groundwater is pumped to the surface and evaporated in extensive ponds.
  • ✔ Evaporation commonly takes 18 months or more; lithium concentration rises as water leaves the system.
  • ✔ Successive ponds allow other minerals to precipitate first, with lithium recovered from the final concentrated brine.
  • ⚠ Risk: significant water consumption in arid climates, with direct impact on aquifer levels and regional water management.

Emerging Direct Lithium Extraction (DLE)

  • ✔ Uses filtration, ion-exchange, or adsorption to extract lithium from brine without large evaporation ponds.
  • ✔ Potential for lower water losses and reduced land footprint.
  • ⚠ Limitation: still scaling commercially; not yet the dominant method at any major operating brine project.

Each pathway carries distinct capital requirements and requires tailored environmental management. The Salton Sea projects noted above are among the most closely watched DLE deployments precisely because they would test these claims at commercial scale.

  • ✔ Hard Rock Mining: high energy use, solid waste generation, visible land disturbance.
  • ✔ Brine Extraction: high water withdrawal, risk of aquifer depletion, salinity plume migration.
  • ✔ DLE: lower land use, potentially reduced water losses — not yet proven at the scale of a major operating salar.

Water Resources, Agriculture, and Lithium Development

In arid and semi-arid regions, a lithium project’s water demand can rival agricultural use in the same basin. Brine deposits are the most water-intensive pathway — evaporation ponds require sustained groundwater withdrawal, exposing already scarce resources to accelerated depletion and, in some basins, contamination risk from brine or process-water migration.

Impact Pathways

Impacts on aquifer levels, groundwater quality, and connected surface water can alter agricultural productivity. Rising salinity in groundwater affects irrigation viability and crop tolerance, while water diverted to lithium ponds can drive local competition between mining and farming users of the same aquifer.

  • ⚠ Risk: depletion of groundwater feeding irrigation wells, affecting farmers directly.
  • ⚠ Risk: migration of salinity plumes into downstream soils and ecosystems.
  • ✔ Mitigation: hydrological modeling before permitting, ongoing aquifer-quality monitoring, and recycled process-water systems.
  • 💧 Aquifer monitoring: forecasts water-level change before it becomes irreversible.
  • 📡 Salinity plume tracking: flags infiltration risk to nearby farmland early.
  • 🌱 Water allocation planning: balances lithium project draw against crop irrigation schedules.

Any developer working a brine deposit needs a water management plan specific to that basin’s hydrology — a sector-wide water-use figure is not a substitute for a site-level assessment, because aquifer recharge rates vary by orders of magnitude between basins.

Common Mistake:

Treating a global or national average water-use figure as predictive for a specific basin. Aquifer recharge, salinity baseline, and competing irrigation demand are basin-specific — a site-level hydrological study is what a permitting authority will actually require.

Impact of Brine Evaporation on Agricultural & Soil Integrity

Brine operations, with their large evaporation ponds, present tangible environmental challenges near farmland:

  • ✔ Large surface footprint, with risk to habitat and topsoil layers underneath ponds.
  • ✔ Tailings and brine residues must be contained to prevent leakage into agricultural soils and downstream waterways.
  • ✔ Excessive evaporation can create new saline areas unsuitable for farming or grazing.

Careful pond siting, advance salinity-migration monitoring, and regular soil testing are standard parts of responsible project planning.

  • 🌾 Mitigation practices: impermeable liners, robust embankments, and vegetative buffer zones to reduce runoff.
  • 🌳 Ecological restoration: post-closure rehabilitation to return disturbed land to productive use.
  • 📊 Water Usage: large evaporation ponds draw sustained groundwater volumes, reducing regional supply available for agriculture and habitat.
  • ⚠ Soil Salinization: brine migration can irreversibly salinize topsoil if containment fails.
  • ✔ Employment & Infrastructure: development drives local job growth and infrastructure investment, which needs balancing against long-term land-use goals.
  • ✔ Market Access: regional investment often expands logistics infrastructure that benefits the wider agricultural sector too.
  • ⚠ Continuous Monitoring: automated sensors and remote observation are the practical way to track groundwater quality and soil integrity over a project’s decades-long life.
Pro Tip:

Pairing satellite-based monitoring with on-ground hydrological sensors gives a scalable way to track environmental change around brine lithium projects over time, supporting both compliance reporting and community trust.

Lithium Mining and Sustainable Forestry Considerations

Forestry operations intersect with hard rock lithium mining wherever pegmatite deposits sit in forested basins. Access-road construction, vegetation clearance, and habitat disturbance raise stewardship and carbon-accounting questions distinct from the water issues that dominate brine projects.

Key Stewardship Strategies

  • 📈 Ecological Assessments: pre-project surveys mapping habitats, migration routes, and ecological corridors.
  • 🌲 Topographic Planning: road and facility layout designed to reduce fragmentation and preserve forest continuity.
  • 🔄 Mine Closure & Reclamation: post-mining restoration, native seed planting, and soil stabilization to support carbon sequestration and biodiversity recovery.
  • ⚠ Risk: erosion and watershed sedimentation from poorly contained excavation and spoil heaps.

Healthy forest cover supports the same water cycles that lithium water-balance planning depends on — so forestry and hydrology assessments for a hard rock project are not separate exercises.

  • 🌳 Vegetation Recovery: accelerated native plant seeding post-closure.
  • 🛤️ Minimal Access Footprint: shared roads for mineral and forest product transport.
  • 📋 Collaborative Land Use: cross-sectoral planning aligning mining and forestry objectives.
  • ♻️ Recycled Water Use: closed-loop processing to reduce aquifer off-take.
  • 🦌 Wildlife Corridors: buffer zones maintaining habitat continuity.
Investor Note:

Mineral assets that can document reduced water use, closed-loop processing, and reclamation commitments are increasingly favored in ESG-screened capital allocation — bring the hydrological study and forestry plan to due diligence, not just the resource estimate.

Comparative Impact Analysis: Global, Brine, US Deposits

The table below compares the three deposit categories that this article covers, using the figures verified above. Where a metric is not published at this granularity, that is noted rather than estimated.

Deposit Category Recent Production / Resource Vintage Primary Method Water-Intensity Concern
Global (all deposits) ~290,000 tonnes production 2025 Brine / Hard Rock / DLE Mixed — brine share dominates
Global brine deposits 407,000 tonnes LCE supply 2023 Evaporation ponds High — arid-basin aquifer draw
United States (all types) 4,000 t mined / ~30M t resource 2024 production / current resource Brine, Hard Rock, emerging DLE Site-specific — Nevada/California arid basins


Sources: Dallas Federal Reserve (Oct 2025) for global figures; USGS Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026 for US production; USGS lithium deposits dataset for US resources. Figures use different reporting units (metal tonnes vs. LCE) — treat as directional comparison, not a like-for-like sum.

US lithium: mine production vs measured & indicated resources 4,000 Mine Production (2024) 30M M&I Resources (2024) Tonnes LCE (log-scale range) USGS Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026 & USGS lithium deposits dataset

Core-Harvesting Initiatives: What the Term Actually Covers

Searches for “core-harvesting initiative,” “core harvesting initiative,” and “planetary core harvesting initiative” reach this page, and the honest answer is that there is no single active institutional program operating under any of those exact names today. Two real things sit near the phrase and are worth naming precisely so the term isn’t misread as evidence of something larger:

  • ✔ Drill-core harvesting, in the literal mineral-exploration sense, refers to pulling and logging rock core from diamond drill programmes — the physical samples used to estimate grade and tonnage in a resource. This is standard industry terminology, not a named “initiative,” and it applies to lithium pegmatite and brine-adjacent claystone exploration alike.
  • ✔ Planetary Resources, the asteroid-mining venture whose name is the closest real match to “planetary core harvesting,” was acquired by ConsenSys in 2018 and does not operate as an independent mining initiative.
  • ✔ The US Department of Energy runs a program called CORE-CM (Carbon Ore, Rare Earth and Critical Minerals), which is real and active — but it is scoped to specific US coal and carbon-ore basins, not a planet-wide “core harvesting” effort, and it is not the source of the phrase as searched.

If a reader arrived here looking for a specific program by that name, the most likely explanations are that the phrase is being used loosely to describe drill-core sampling work at a named project, or it references DOE’s CORE-CM initiative under an imprecise label. Either way, the exploration technique underneath the phrase — extracting and analyzing rock core to confirm what a satellite or geophysical survey flagged as prospective — is exactly the step described in the sections below on satellite-based mineral detection.

Farmonaut: Satellite-Based Mining Intelligence for Global Lithium Deposits

Early, accurate detection of lithium — in brine salars or hard rock pegmatites — improves exploration efficiency, reduces cost, and avoids unnecessary surface disturbance before any drill core is pulled. Farmonaut combines multispectral and hyperspectral satellite data with AI-driven analysis to map mineral prospectivity before ground disturbance begins.

🌐 Map Your Mining Site Here for Strategic Insights & Early Exploration Success

➡️ Map Your Mining Site Here



Get geospatial intelligence on lithium, precious metals, and energy minerals worldwide — reduce risk, accelerate discovery, and support sustainable mining decisions.

Our satellite based mineral detection (full overview at farmonaut.com/satellite-based-mineral-detection) delivers fast, objective mineral target generation from non-invasive spaceborne data — cutting exploration timelines from months to days and reducing exploration-stage disturbance to zero.

  • ✔ Detect lithium-bearing zones, alteration halos, and host geology across large regional tracts — no ground clearing required.
  • ✔ Multi-mineral detection spanning precious, base, energy, and specialty minerals — lithium, rare earths, gold, copper, uranium, and more.
  • ✔ Structured reports and georeferenced maps compatible with GIS platforms, for direct comparison against drill-core results once ground-truthing begins.

Satellite-driven 3D mineral prospectivity mapping (see sample here) supports decision-making for both technical and commercial stakeholders. These 3D models and TargetMax™ Drilling Intelligence help focus core-drilling investment on the highest-potential zones — narrowing exactly where a “core harvesting” programme should target before it starts.

Using satellite-based mineral detection, companies and investors reduce ground disturbance, lower field-mobilization costs, and support environmental stewardship from the earliest project stage — aligning with ESG expectations for modern lithium exploration.

Ready to discuss your lithium, brine, or multi-mineral exploration ambitions?
Get Quote or Contact Us today.

Key Benefit:

Farmonaut’s AI-powered satellite analytics accelerate cost-effective mineral intelligence for global lithium deposits — narrowing where physical drill-core work needs to happen at all.

Strategic Lithium Supply Chains & Sustainable Land Management

Diversified domestic production increases national resilience and reduces exposure to price volatility. The US lithium deposit resurgence is driven by the resource-production gap detailed above — 30 million tonnes of resource against only 4,000 tonnes mined in 2024 — and by the policy priority of reducing import dependency.

Land-use planning, transparent environmental impact statements, and stakeholder engagement with farming communities, tribal nations, and mining operators are increasingly required by US regulators and by institutional investors.

  • ✔ Mapping critical water and soil resources to inform safe project siting.
  • ✔ Integrating agricultural and forestry land values into mineral development plans.
  • ✔ Continuous Environmental Monitoring: satellite observation and AI-powered trend analysis support adaptive management across the project lifecycle.
  • ✔ Stakeholder Transparency: community input and ongoing risk assessment build long-term project viability.

Sustainable integration of lithium resources depends on balancing mineral development with water stewardship, habitat protection, and the long-term productivity of agricultural and forested land — a balance struck project-by-project, not by sector-wide policy alone.

Planning Tip:

Combine satellite, hydrological, and ecological data in one integrated model for predictive land-use planning in new lithium project areas — rather than commissioning each study in isolation.
  • 📊 Conduct baseline environmental surveys before project approval.
  • 🛰️ Use satellite remote sensing for monitoring & risk alerts.
  • ♻️ Prioritize recycled water and tailings containment systems.
  • 🤝 Collaborate with community stakeholders & regulators.

Calculator: Estimate Brine Pond Water Draw

Brine evaporation water intensity varies by basin, but every estimate starts from the same three inputs: pond surface area, an evaporation rate specific to that climate, and the number of months the pond runs before harvest. Enter your own project’s numbers below to see an order-of-magnitude water draw — it will not substitute for a site hydrological study, but it shows how sensitive the total is to each input.

Interactive

Run your own numbers

Assumptions: this models direct evaporative water loss from open pond surface area only — it excludes pumping withdrawal beyond what feeds the ponds, precipitation input, liner seepage, and freshwater used in downstream processing. Evaporation rate should reflect your specific basin’s climate data, not a global average; arid salars can exceed 6mm/day in summer months and fall well below it in winter.

Adjacent Commodity Signals: Grain Prices & Seed Storage

Two search terms outside lithium and mining occasionally route to mining and agriculture content on this site: global grain prices, and the Svalbard Global Seed Vault. Neither belongs to the core subject of lithium brine deposits, but both have real, current figures worth stating plainly rather than ignoring.

Global Grain Prices

The FAO Food Price Index stood at 133.3 points in August 2026, with sorghum up 3.9% and barley up 2.6% month-on-month, per the FAO Food Price Index. On the US side, USDA’s August 2026 WASDE report projects a 2026/27 season-average farm price of $6.20/bushel for wheat and $13.50/cwt for all-rice, alongside expected global stock changes of −7% for corn and −2% for wheat for the 2026/27 season — see the USDA WASDE August 2026 report. USDA releases WASDE monthly, typically mid-month; FAO updates its index around the 8th of each month, so check those two sources directly for the current release rather than relying on this snapshot.

FAO Food Price Index: month-on-month commodity changes, August 2026 0% 1% 2% 3% Month-on-month change (%) Sorghum +3.9% Barley +2.6% FAO Food Price Index, August 2026

Svalbard Global Seed Vault

The Svalbard Global Seed Vault held 1,401,285 seed samples representing 6,539 crop species as of September 2026, according to the NordGen Seed Portal, which publishes live holdings figures. The vault has no direct connection to lithium or mineral exploration — it is included here only because the search term reaches mining and agriculture content on this domain, and the honest, current figure is more useful to a reader than silence.

Key Insights, Pro Tips & Investor Notes

Key Insight: Water and land management planning must operate at basin scale, not sector-average scale, to hold up under regulatory review.
Common Mistake: Delaying engagement with agricultural stakeholders until after permitting risks community opposition and costly project delays.
Investor Note: The 30-million-tonne US resource base against 4,000 tonnes of 2024 production is the number that frames domestic lithium’s investment case — check USGS’s annual Mineral Commodity Summaries for the updated production figure each year.
Pro Tip: Satellite-based detection narrows where physical drill-core programmes need to target, cutting both cost and environmental footprint before any core is pulled.
Environmental Watch: Real-time monitoring platforms streamline ongoing compliance reporting and help future-proof projects against evolving water-rights regulation.

FAQs: Lithium, Brine, Water & Land Management

What are the two main types of lithium deposits?

The two deposit types are hard rock lithium deposits (pegmatites) and lithium brine deposits (salt lakes/salars). Each requires different extraction methods, processing technology, and environmental review.

How much of global lithium supply comes from brine?

Global brine-sourced lithium supply reached 407,000 tonnes LCE in 2023, against roughly 290,000 tonnes of total global lithium production in 2025, per Dallas Federal Reserve research — brine is the larger share of global supply, concentrated in South America’s Lithium Triangle.

How does lithium extraction from brine impact water resources?

Brine extraction pumps lithium-rich groundwater to the surface and evaporates it in ponds over roughly 18 months or longer. This depletes aquifers, especially in arid basins, and can raise salinity in nearby soils and water sources.

How much lithium does the US actually produce?

The US mined 4,000 tonnes of lithium in 2024, according to USGS Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026, against a domestic resource base of roughly 30 million tonnes of measured and indicated lithium across all deposit types.

What is the “core-harvesting initiative”?

No institutional program operates under that exact name. The phrase most likely refers loosely to drill-core sampling in mineral exploration, to DOE’s CORE-CM critical-minerals initiative (which is US-basin-specific, not planet-wide), or to Planetary Resources, the asteroid-mining venture acquired by ConsenSys in 2018.

Can lithium mining be sustainable?

Through comprehensive hydrological modeling, water recycling, soil monitoring, and careful site selection — yes. Direct lithium extraction (DLE) and satellite-based monitoring, such as Farmonaut’s, further reduce land and water impact versus conventional evaporation-pond brine operations.

How can satellite data improve lithium exploration?

Satellite analytics target prospective mineral zones and monitor environmental change across large areas without ground disturbance, narrowing where physical drill-core work needs to happen and reducing exploration cost and land impact.

Where can I learn more or map my own mining site?

Map Your Mining Site Here for a customized analysis, or visit Satellite Based Mineral Detection for full product details.

Lithium brine deposits supply the largest single share of global lithium — 407,000 tonnes LCE in 2023 against roughly 290,000 tonnes of total 2025 global production — and that supply is concentrated in the arid basins where water competition with agriculture is sharpest. The US sits on a resource base of about 30 million tonnes but mined only 4,000 tonnes in 2024, meaning the domestic story is still mostly ahead of it. “Core-harvesting initiative” turns out not to name any single active program — the closest real matches are ordinary drill-core sampling terminology and DOE’s basin-specific CORE-CM effort.

  • ✔ Basin-specific hydrological planning, not sector averages, is what determines whether a brine project and nearby farmland can coexist.
  • 📊 Check USGS Mineral Commodity Summaries annually for updated US production and resource figures — the 4,000-tonne and 30-million-tonne figures above will move as new projects report.
  • ⚠ Water and salinity risks are real — but site-level monitoring and DLE technology are shrinking the footprint per tonne over time.
  • 🌍 Satellite-based exploration narrows where physical core drilling needs to happen at all, cutting cost and disturbance before ground is broken.

For a detailed site-level report, Get Quote.
To discuss your geospatial data or sustainability needs, Contact Us.
For instant mapping and mineral target screening, Map Your Mining Site Here.

Discover more about our core services:

Ready to transform your mining or land management strategy with satellite-powered intelligence?
Contact us today to get started.








Farmonaut Farmonaut Trusted by 200,000+ users and 100+ businesses 200,000+ users trust us Viahara MiningMining SARLSenGold Invest SASSahel Shipping SASania CorporationSahara MiningEnterprise TakreemSean Mining LimitedSMA Investments LtdNTS Group (Pty) LtdKlusetic Mining InvestmentsMine4AfricaTimestream MiningLithspo Minerals LimitedMulopwe Metals Mining LtdRains of FavourTintina Mining GroupHuckleberry Garnet LLCProcess Metrology LLCWSP Investment CompanyDalgety Minerals Pty LtdVortex Minerals Pty LtdSwati MineralsFaith At Work (Pty) LtdGeotech Mining Solutions plcVulcan International LimitedKidepo AssociatesGKY MiningAlkimy SARLDouble A TradingTipareth MinesGeoticgyGemSprout Metals LimitedSouthbridge & Wess PDC LtdQader GroupIleys General TradingSG Gold Mining LLCVRV Global Pte LtdOmsri International FZEMineral Gulf Transhipment DMCC Get started