Comment

Irrigation ยท Cost guide

Drip Irrigation Cost per Acre: Prices, Payback, Upgrades

A Kentucky extension estimate put a 1-acre vegetable drip system at $2,585 (2015 prices) and about $400 for each extra acre; Texas A&M put subsurface drip at $1,200 per acre gross on 160-acre fields. Here is what drives the cost, when it pays back, and which upgrades matter.

Authored by Farmonaut Research & Content Team
Reviewed and verified by Farmonaut Agricultural Experts Team
Updated 16 October 2026 ยท 15 min read
Sentinel-2 Satellite View Of Vegetable Fields On Drip And Sprinkler Irrigation, Salinas Valley, California
Sentinel-2 view of Vegetable fields on drip and sprinkler irrigation, Salinas Valley, California. Contains modified Copernicus Sentinel data, processed in Google Earth Engine.

Key takeaways

  • A 1-acre drip system for vegetables cost $2,585 including tape and mulch, plus about $400 per extra acre up to 10 acres (University of Kentucky, 2015 prices).
  • On 160-acre fields, gross investment was $1,200 per acre for subsurface drip against $208.56 for furrow (Texas A&M AgriLife, 2011).
  • Subsurface drip had 97% application efficiency against 60% for furrow, so it pumped 18.14 instead of 29.33 inches per acre for a high water-use crop (Texas A&M).
  • NRCS obligated more than $535 million to microirrigation through EQIP from FY2014 to FY2023 (farmdoc daily); Pennsylvania’s FY2026 base rate for surface tape is $1,006.63 per system.
  • “Drift irrigation” is a common slip for drip irrigation; it is not a recognised irrigation method.
In this article
  1. Drift irrigation or drip irrigation: what you are really comparing
  2. Drip irrigation cost per acre: what the numbers show
  3. Where the money goes in a drip system
  4. Water use: how much drip saves on pumping
  5. Is drip irrigation worth it? Work out your payback
  6. 7 drip irrigation upgrades and what each one does
  7. Cost table: drip upgrades at a glance
  8. How to plan a drip system in six steps
  9. Drip for farms outside the US
  10. Sustainability: water, soil and energy
  11. Where satellite monitoring fits
  12. How we checked the numbers
  13. FAQ

Drip irrigation cost per acre ranges widely: a Kentucky extension fact sheet put a 1-acre vegetable drip system at $2,585 for equipment, tape and mulch (2015 prices), plus about $400 for each extra acre. A Texas A&M study of 160-acre fields put subsurface drip at $1,200 per acre gross, against $208.56 for furrow irrigation. This page shows where those dollars go, how to judge the payback on your own farm, and which upgrades are worth the money.

If you searched for “drift irrigation”, you are almost certainly looking for drip irrigation. “Drift” is not a recognised irrigation method in extension or USDA material. Older versions of this page used the word for surface or flood irrigation, so we compare drip with surface systems below. Below you will find three charts built from extension data, a payback calculator, a cost table and a list of seven upgrades with what each one does.

Drift irrigation or drip irrigation: what you are really comparing

Drip irrigation sends water through plastic pipe and tubing to emitters placed next to each plant. It wets a narrow strip of soil around the roots. Surface irrigation, which includes furrow and flood methods, lets water run across the field by gravity. NRCS defines microirrigation as frequent, small applications of water on or below the soil surface as drops, tiny streams or fine spray, and the farmdoc daily review of NRCS irrigation practice standards sets that definition beside the sprinkler standard.

Drip comes in two main forms. Surface drip uses thin-walled tape or thicker polyethylene tubing laid on the soil, often under plastic mulch. Subsurface drip (SDI) buries the drip lines below the tillage depth so they can stay in place for many seasons. Tape is cheap and is often replaced each year. Buried lines cost more up front but are built to last.

The USDA Economic Research Service groups sprinkler and drip as pressurized irrigation. It notes in its irrigation and water use topic page that pressurized systems are generally more water-use efficient than gravity systems under many field conditions, because less water is lost to evaporation, deep percolation and runoff. The same page says farms with some irrigation accounted for more than 50% of US crop sales in the 2022 Census of Agriculture, while irrigated land was less than 17% of harvested cropland.

Quick comparison: drip vs surface irrigation

Feature Surface (furrow or flood) Drip (surface or buried)
Application efficiency About 60% with good management (Texas A&M) About 97% for subsurface drip (Texas A&M)
Upfront cost Low; land levelling, pipe and gates Higher; pump, filters, valves, tubing
Operating pressure About 10 psi in the Texas study 8 to 12 psi for tape; 15 psi for SDI
Labour Gates, siphons, watching the water Checking filters, flushing lines, leaks
Fertilizer Broadcast or banded Can be injected through the lines
Best fit Level fields, plenty of water Vegetables, orchards, vines, scarce water

The efficiency figures come from the assumptions in one Texas study; your own field may differ. A badly managed drip system can waste water too, through leaks, clogged emitters or simply running too long.

Drip irrigation cost per acre: what the numbers show

Published drip costs vary because the systems vary. A one-acre market garden on tape and a 160-acre buried system on corn are different purchases. Here are the three main sources we found, with the date and the type of price each one gives.

Small vegetable farms: the Kentucky estimate

The University of Kentucky Center for Crop Diversification fact sheet on irrigation systems lists the parts of a 1-acre drip setup for vegetables. The equipment came to $2,185 and the tape plus plastic mulch to $400 per acre, so the first acre cost $2,585 in 2015. Each extra acre, up to about 10 acres, added about $400 for tape and mulch. These are estimated purchase prices from a 2016-17 vegetable production guide, not dealer quotes for today.

The same sheet adds two costs that small growers often forget: a mulch layer and bed shaper ($1,200 to $5,000) and a waterwheel transplanter ($2,000 to $2,500). Some Kentucky counties rent these out, which cuts the cash a grower needs. It also notes that cheaper disc filters (about $170) can replace sand filters on small farms using well water, while sand filters may still be needed for surface water.

The fixed parts (pump, filter, injector, valves) are a one-time cost. Tape and mulch return every season. That split matters when you work out the payback, because the season cost never goes away.

Large fields: the Texas A&M comparison

A Texas A&M AgriLife Extension bulletin on the economics of irrigation systems compared five ways to water a quarter section (160 acres). Gross investment for the distribution system ran from $208.56 per acre for furrow to $1,200 per acre for subsurface drip. The well, pump and engine were left out because they were assumed the same for every system. The study was published in 2011, so treat the dollar values as a guide to the gap between systems, not as current prices.

Net investment, after tax savings and salvage value, was $1,009.13 per acre for SDI at a 15% marginal tax rate and $891.97 at 28% (both with a 6% discount rate). In other words, the tax position of the farm changed the real cost of drip by more than $117 per acre. The bulletin also found that a half-mile center pivot cost 40% less per acre than four quarter-mile pivots.

What NRCS pays toward drip in one state

Many US farms put in drip with help from the Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP). The Pennsylvania NRCS FY2026 payment schedule lists rates under practice 441, Irrigation System, Microirrigation. These are payment rates, not the full price of a system, and other states set their own rates.

Practice (PA, FY2026) Standard rate Historically underserved rate
Surface tape, base $1,006.63 per system $1,207.95 per system
Surface tape, length $0.13 per foot $0.15 per foot
PE tube with emitters, base $5,363.14 per system $6,435.77 per system
PE tube, length $0.43 per foot $0.51 per foot
Microjet, base $7,084.30 per system $8,501.16 per system
Hoop house drip $0.33 per sq ft $0.40 per sq ft

Across the country, NRCS obligated more than $535 million to microirrigation practices from FY2014 to FY2023, about 15.6% of EQIP irrigation spending in those years, according to the farmdoc daily review. Microirrigation contracts also require an irrigation water management plan under practice 449. Check eligibility, rates and deadlines with your local NRCS office, as the rules change by state and year.

Chart

Gross investment by irrigation system

US dollars per acre, distribution system only, 160-acre field (well and pump excluded)

$0$375$750$1,125$1,500$209Furrow$338Pivot, half mile$556Pivot, quartermile$1,200Subsurface dripSource: Texas A&M AgriLife Extension, Economics of Irrigation Systems, bulletin B-6113 (2011), Table 2.
$0$375$750$1,125$1,500Furrow$209Pivot, half mile$338Pivot, quarter mile$556Subsurface drip$1,200Source: Texas A&M AgriLife Extension, Economics of IrrigationSystems, bulletin B-6113 (2011), Table 2.
Subsurface drip cost almost six times as much per acre as furrow in this study.

Where the money goes in a drip system

A drip system is a chain of parts. Each one has a job, and skipping one usually costs more later than it saves now.

  • Water source and pump. Wells, ponds, streams or a municipal line. Drip tape usually needs 8 to 12 psi, so many small farms use a small centrifugal pump.
  • Filter. Sand, disc or screen filters stop sand, algae and organic matter from blocking emitters. Surface water needs more filtering than most well water.
  • Backflow prevention and injector. Needed if you push fertilizer through the lines, and often required by local rules.
  • Pressure regulators and valves. Keep flow even across the field and let you water blocks in turn.
  • Mainline and submains. Layflat hose or PVC carries water to each block.
  • Drip tape or tubing. The emitters sit inside the tape at a fixed spacing.
  • Controller and sensors. Optional on small farms, common on larger ones.

The Kentucky parts list makes the split clear. The filter and the pump take more than half of the one-time equipment spend on a small farm.

Water quality decides your filter bill

Emitters have tiny openings. Sand, iron, algae and lime deposits all block them. The FAO guide Water quality for agriculture explains how salinity and specific ions limit the use of a water source for irrigation. Get a water test before you buy a filter, because the result tells the dealer what kind of filter and treatment you need. A cheap filter on dirty water leads to blocked lines and uneven watering.

Chart

Parts cost of a 1-acre vegetable drip system

US dollars, estimated purchase prices, Kentucky, 2015

$0$200$400$600$800Sand filter$725Pump and engine$700Tape and mulch, per acre$400Backflush valve$260Fertilizer injector$200Layflat hose, 300 ft$105Fittings, valves, gauges$100Suction hose, strainer$95Source: University of Kentucky Center for Crop Diversification, Irrigation Systems fact sheet CCD-FS-1 (2017), from the 2016-17Vegetable Production Guide for Commercial Growers.
$0$200$400$600$800Sand filter$725Pump and engine$700Tape and mulch, per acre$400Backflush valve$260Fertilizer injector$200Layflat hose, 300 ft$105Fittings, valves, gauges$100Suction hose, strainer$95Source: University of Kentucky Center for CropDiversification, Irrigation Systems fact sheet CCD-FS-1(2017), from the 2016-17 Vegetable Production Guide forCommercial Growers.
The sand filter and the pump take more than half of the one-time equipment spend; tape and mulch recur every season.

Water use: how much drip saves on pumping

The Texas A&M study gave each system an application efficiency: 60% for furrow, 78% for mid-elevation spray pivots, 88% for low-elevation spray (LESA), 95% for LEPA and 97% for subsurface drip. To put the same water in the root zone, the furrow system had to pump 47% more water than the LESA pivot.

The study turned those efficiencies into inches pumped for three crops. For a high water-use crop such as corn, furrow pumped 29.33 inches per acre and SDI 18.14 inches. For a low water-use crop such as cotton, the figures were 11.73 and 7.26 inches. Less water pumped means lower fuel or power bills, but the drip system has higher fixed costs to carry.

The bulletin found that SDI had the highest fixed cost per acre-inch pumped, $6.05 against $1.10 for furrow, for a medium water-use crop at a 350-foot pumping lift. For a medium water-use crop, LEPA had the lowest annual pumping cost of the five systems, $178.45 per acre. Drip did not win on every count in that study. For a medium water-use crop, SDI’s total pumping cost of $216.41 per acre was higher than the LEPA ($178.45) and LESA ($190.40) pivots.

Chart

Water pumped by irrigation system

Inches per acre to deliver the same water to the crop; low = cotton, high = corn scenario

Low water-use cropHigh water-use crop0.07.515.022.530.0Furrow11.729.3Mid-elevation spray9.022.6Low-elevation spray8.020.0LEPA pivot7.418.5Subsurface drip7.318.1Source: Texas A&M AgriLife Extension, Economics of Irrigation Systems, bulletin B-6113 (2011), Table 3.
Low water-use cropHigh water-use crop0.07.515.022.530.0Furrow11.729.3Mid-elevation spray9.022.6Low-elevation spray8.020.0LEPA pivot7.418.5Subsurface drip7.318.1Source: Texas A&M AgriLife Extension, Economics of IrrigationSystems, bulletin B-6113 (2011), Table 3.
Subsurface drip pumped the least in both scenarios; the gap with furrow is widest for a thirsty crop.

Is drip irrigation worth it? Work out your payback

Drip pays when the value of extra crop, water saved and labour saved is larger than the yearly cost of owning and running the system. For high-value vegetables the case is often clear. The Kentucky fact sheet says hundreds of demonstrations on small farms in the state found that drip with plastic mulch, in most cases, doubled marketable yields compared with rain-fed production. It worked out that a tomato grower needed $1,237 more in yearly production value per acre to cover the drip system, about 600 to 1,000 pounds of tomatoes.

Try the numbers for your own farm below.

Calculator

Will drip irrigation pay on your farm?

Enter your own costs, water savings and expected crop gain per acre.

acres

$/acre

years

$/acre

acre-in

$/acre-in

$/acre
$4net gain per acre per year (negative means drip costs more than it returns)
  • Yearly share of install cost per acre: $120
  • Pumping saved per acre per year: $84
  • Net gain across all drip acres per year: $80
  • Simple payback on install cost (99 = never pays back): 9.7 years

Example values only, chosen to sit near break-even; they are not benchmarks or forecasts. The install cost of $1,200 per acre echoes the Texas A&M B-6113 (2011) gross figure for subsurface drip, the $400 yearly tape and mulch cost echoes the University of Kentucky estimate (2015), and about $14 per acre-inch is close to the Texas A&M LEPA operating cost of $13.76 at a 350-foot lift; replace all of them with your own quotes. That LEPA figure is a total cost that includes fixed costs, which do not fall when you pump less, so use only your variable energy and pumping cost per acre-inch here. Payback is capped at 99 years; a result of 99 means the yearly saving does not cover the yearly running cost, so drip never pays back on these numbers. The install cost is spread evenly over the system life with no interest. This is not financial advice.

For field crops such as corn or cotton the margin is thinner, and the answer depends on water supply, pumping depth and crop price. Use the calculator below with your own figures. It spreads the install cost over the years you expect the system to last, then compares that and the yearly tape cost with the value of water and crop gains.

What changes the payback most

  • Crop value per acre. A small yield gain on a high-value crop can cover the system in a few seasons. The same gain on a low-value crop may never cover it.
  • Water scarcity. If your well output limits how many acres you can water, saving water lets you irrigate more ground.
  • Pumping lift and energy price. Deeper wells and higher power prices raise the value of each acre-inch saved.
  • System life. Buried drip on a permanent layout is spread over more years than tape that is replaced each season.
  • Cost share and tax. EQIP payments and your tax rate change the net cost, as the Texas bulletin shows.

This is a budgeting tool, not financial advice. Talk to your lender, accountant or extension economist before a large purchase.

7 drip irrigation upgrades and what each one does

If you already run drip, these upgrades target the problems growers report most: uneven watering, clogged lines, wasted water and time spent on manual checks. They are listed roughly in the order most farms would add them, from cheapest to most involved.

1. Better filtration

What it does: removes the particles that block emitters. Best for: any system on pond, river or canal water. A disc or screen filter suits clean well water; sand media filters suit water with algae or organic matter, as the Kentucky sheet notes. Add a pressure gauge on each side of the filter so you can see when it needs cleaning.

2. Pressure regulators and flow control valves

What it does: keeps pressure even so emitters at the far end get as much water as those near the pump. Best for: sloping ground and long runs. Uneven pressure is a common reason one part of a field stays dry while another stays wet.

3. Soil moisture sensors

What it does: tells you when the root zone is actually drying out, so you water on need rather than on a fixed timetable. Best for: growers who want to cut over-watering. Kentucky extension suggests that inexpensive tensiometers or moisture meters can guide timing on small farms. A Frontiers in Plant Science study tested a sensor feedback system that automated deficit irrigation scheduling for cotton.

4. Automatic timers and controllers

What it does: opens and closes valves on a schedule or on a sensor signal, so blocks get water without someone on site. Best for: farms with several blocks or labour shortages. Drip maker Rivulis describes the move from manual to automatic drip operation as starting with valves and a controller before adding remote control.

5. Fertigation injectors

What it does: feeds fertilizer through the lines in small doses close to the roots. Best for: vegetables and fruit where nutrient timing matters. Fit a backflow preventer so fertilizer cannot flow back into the water source. Follow the product label and your state’s rules on chemigation and backflow devices.

6. Subsurface drip lines

What it does: moves the lines below the tillage zone, which keeps the surface drier and lets the system stay put for many seasons. Best for: row crops on permanent field layouts where water is short. It is the most expensive option in the Texas study and needs careful design for root intrusion and rodent damage.

7. Remote field checks with satellite imagery

What it does: shows which parts of a field are growing more slowly than the rest, so you know where to walk first to look for a blocked line, a leak or a pressure problem. Best for: large or scattered fields that are hard to check on foot. Variable rate research on maize and soybean in west-central Nebraska shows how mapped differences inside a field can guide where water goes. Satellite maps show changes in plant growth; they do not show the cause, so a field visit is still needed.

How the NDWI and MNDWI satellite water indices differ, and which one a farmer should use.

โ–ถ How the NDWI and MNDWI satellite water indices differ, and which one a farmer should use. ยท 2:45

Cost table: drip upgrades at a glance

Upgrade Main benefit Typical fit Cost data we found
Filtration Fewer clogged emitters Surface water Disc about $170, sand $725 (Kentucky, 2015)
Pressure control Even watering Slopes, long runs Fittings, valves, gauges $100 (Kentucky, 2015)
Moisture sensors Water on need Any farm No single figure
Timers Less labour Several blocks No single figure
Fertigation Feed at the roots Vegetables, fruit Injector $200 (Kentucky, 2015)
Subsurface drip Long life, dry surface Row crops $1,200 per acre gross (Texas A&M, 2011)
Satellite checks Find problem areas Large fields Subscription; ask the provider

Prices for sensors and controllers vary too much by brand and number of zones to give one fair figure. Ask two or three local dealers for written quotes that list each part.

How to plan a drip system in six steps

  1. Test your water. Check sediment, iron, salts and bacteria. The result picks your filter and any treatment.
  2. Measure your supply. Know the flow your well or pump gives in gallons per minute. This limits how many acres you can water at once.
  3. Map the field into blocks. Group rows by crop, slope and soil so each block can be watered on its own.
  4. Get a design. Kentucky extension notes that most farms need an irrigation professional to plan an efficient system. Ask for emitter spacing, flow rates and pressure at the end of each line.
  5. Check cost share. Ask NRCS about EQIP before you buy; work started before a contract is signed is usually not eligible.
  6. Plan upkeep. Budget time to flush lines, clean filters and fix leaks. The UGA snap bean guide warns that growers new to drip should think carefully about the changes it brings to irrigation management.

Drip for farms outside the US

The cost structure is the same in Canada, the UK, Europe and Australia: pump, filter, mains, tape or tube, and controls. Prices and grant schemes differ. In each country, check the farm advisory service or agriculture department for current grants and for rules on water abstraction and backflow. The dollar figures on this page are US figures and will not convert directly.

Sustainability: water, soil and energy

Drip puts water where roots can use it, which can cut runoff and erosion compared with flooding a field. It keeps the soil between rows drier, which can mean fewer weeds there. It also lowers pumping volume, as the Texas figures show, which saves energy. The plastic matters too: tape and mulch need collection and, where possible, recycling at the end of each season.

Water saving at the field does not always mean water saving at the basin. The farmdoc daily review notes that the NRCS microirrigation standard does not itself require cuts in water use. If a farm uses saved water to irrigate more acres, total use may not fall. Check what your state water agency counts as a saving if you are applying for water-linked grants.

For a wider look at farm methods, see our comparison of conventional and sustainable agriculture, including the drip irrigation system.

Seven green farming technologies, including efficient irrigation, ranked in a short explainer.

โ–ถ Seven green farming technologies, including efficient irrigation, ranked in a short explainer. ยท 2:24

Where satellite monitoring fits

A drip system can fail quietly. A blocked submain or a cut line may leave a strip of crop short of water for days before anyone notices. Farmonaut provides satellite crop health maps that show vegetation changes across each field every few days, so growers can see where to check first. You can open the Farmonaut web and mobile apps to view your own fields.

Related pages on our site: carbon footprinting, product traceability, fleet management, crop loan and insurance verification, large-scale farm management platform and API developer docs.

A farmer finds one weak corner of his field on satellite crop monitoring maps.

โ–ถ A farmer finds one weak corner of his field on satellite crop monitoring maps. ยท 4:32

How we checked the numbers

Every cost and efficiency figure on this page comes from a named extension service, USDA agency or journal, with its year. We used the Kentucky fact sheet for small vegetable farms, the Texas A&M bulletin for large fields, and the Pennsylvania NRCS schedule for cost-share rates. Older figures are labelled with their year, because drip prices have changed since they were published. We did not find a recent national survey of drip installation costs, so we do not give one national price.

For a closer look at a related question, see our guide: Sprayer Pump Solutions: Top 5 Farm Sprayer Pumps for Optimal Performance.

FAQ

What is drift irrigation?

“Drift irrigation” is usually a typing slip or a mix-up for drip irrigation. It is not a recognised method in extension or USDA guides. Some web pages use the word for surface or flood irrigation, where water spreads across the field by gravity.

How much does drip irrigation cost per acre?

Published figures range from about $400 per extra acre for tape and mulch on a small Kentucky vegetable farm (2015) to $1,200 per acre gross for subsurface drip on a 160-acre Texas field (2011). The first acre costs more because it carries the pump, filter and valves. Get local written quotes for current prices.

How long does drip tape last?

Thin-walled tape is often replaced each season, which is why the Kentucky budget counts tape and mulch as a yearly cost. Thicker tubing and buried drip lines are built to last many seasons. The Texas A&M study assumed a 25-year life for the systems it compared.

Can I get help paying for drip irrigation?

In the US, NRCS can share the cost through EQIP under practice 441, Irrigation System, Microirrigation. Rates differ by state; Pennsylvania’s FY2026 schedule, for example, lists $1,006.63 as the base rate for a surface tape system. Contact your local NRCS office before you buy.

Does drip irrigation raise yields?

It can, mainly for vegetables and fruit. Kentucky demonstrations found drip with plastic mulch, in most cases, doubled marketable yields compared with rain-fed production. Results for field crops depend on rainfall, water supply and management.

Is drip better than a center pivot?

Not always. In the Texas A&M study, subsurface drip had the highest application efficiency (97%), but a LEPA pivot (95%) had the lowest annual pumping cost for a medium water-use crop, and pivots cost much less to install per acre. Drip suits high-value crops, odd-shaped fields and scarce water best.

Authored by: Farmonaut Research & Content Team

Reviewed and verified by: Farmonaut Agricultural Experts Team

Reviewed October 2026 against University of Kentucky CCD-FS-1, Texas A&M AgriLife B-6113, the Pennsylvania NRCS FY2026 EQIP payment schedule, farmdoc daily, USDA ERS and FAO irrigation water quality guidance.

Farmonaut crop monitoring

Spot dry patches in your drip blocks

Farmonaut satellite crop maps show where growth lags inside each field, so you know which drip blocks to check first.

Open The Farmonaut Crop Monitoring Web AppGet The Farmonaut App On Google PlayGet The Farmonaut App On The App Store
Farmonaut Web App With A Satellite Crop Health Map

Sources

  1. University of Kentucky Center for Crop Diversification, Irrigation Systems, CCD-FS-1 (2017): publications.ca.uky.edu
  2. Texas A&M AgriLife Extension, Economics of Irrigation Systems, B-6113 (2011): agecoext.tamu.edu
  3. farmdoc daily (University of Illinois), Conservation Quandaries Part 3: practice standards for irrigation (March 2025): farmdocdaily.illinois.edu
  4. USDA Economic Research Service, Irrigation and Water Use topic page (2022 Census data): ers.usda.gov
  5. USDA NRCS Pennsylvania, FY2026 EQIP and CSP published cost list and payment caps (2026): nrcs-prod.azureedge.us
  6. USDA NRCS, Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP): nrcs-prod.azureedge.us
  7. FAO, Water quality for agriculture, Irrigation and Drainage Paper 29: fao.org
  8. Frontiers in Plant Science, Sensor feedback system enables automated deficit irrigation scheduling for cotton (2023): frontiersin.org
  9. Variable rate irrigation of maize and soybean in west-central Nebraska under full and deficit irrigation (PMC, 2021): ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  10. University of Georgia CAES, Commercial Snap Bean Production in Georgia, B1369: fieldreport.caes.uga.edu
  11. Rivulis, Converting from manual to automatic operation of a drip irrigation system: rivulis.com


Discussion

Questions, corrections or field experience? Share them below. First-time comments are reviewed before they appear, and your email is never published.

No comments yet. Be the first to add a question or your experience.

Leave a comment

Farmonaut Farmonaut Trusted by 200,000+ users and 100+ businesses 200,000+ users trust us Get started